Tina Glasner

739 total citations
21 papers, 375 citations indexed

About

Tina Glasner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Glasner has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 375 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Health and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Tina Glasner's work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (7 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). Tina Glasner is often cited by papers focused on Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (7 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). Tina Glasner collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Tina Glasner's co-authors include W. van der Vaart, Dorret I. Boomsma, Eveline L. de Zeeuw, Eco J. C. de Geus, Meike Bartels, Robert F. Belli, Renske Kruizinga, Wil Dijkstra, Maria M. Groen‐Blokhuis and Erik A. Ehli and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Cognitive Psychology and Behavior Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Tina Glasner

21 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tina Glasner Netherlands 10 133 53 51 48 48 21 375
Jacob Felson United States 10 186 1.4× 80 1.5× 107 2.1× 67 1.4× 39 0.8× 14 453
Elizabeth Johnson United States 8 240 1.8× 53 1.0× 42 0.8× 118 2.5× 63 1.3× 18 548
Barbara Thomas United States 14 104 0.8× 116 2.2× 25 0.5× 73 1.5× 39 0.8× 52 517
W. van der Vaart Netherlands 11 225 1.7× 75 1.4× 61 1.2× 55 1.1× 16 0.3× 34 462
Linda G. Kimmel United States 11 98 0.7× 71 1.3× 17 0.3× 64 1.3× 55 1.1× 20 423
Arnulf Kolstad Norway 10 91 0.7× 63 1.2× 20 0.4× 94 2.0× 17 0.4× 32 416
Laurel Austin Canada 8 67 0.5× 47 0.9× 14 0.3× 60 1.3× 30 0.6× 15 345
Servet Aker Türkiye 13 130 1.0× 83 1.6× 24 0.5× 163 3.4× 23 0.5× 38 556
Christina Lachance United States 15 126 0.9× 210 4.0× 57 1.1× 56 1.2× 13 0.3× 21 627
Natalie Hayes United States 5 48 0.4× 43 0.8× 43 0.8× 126 2.6× 77 1.6× 5 491

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Glasner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Glasner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Glasner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Glasner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Glasner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Glasner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Glasner. The network helps show where Tina Glasner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Glasner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Glasner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Glasner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Glasner. Tina Glasner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kruizinga, Renske, et al.. (2023). Enhancing the integration of chaplains within the healthcare team A qualitative analysis of a survey study among healthcare chaplains. PubMed. 4(1). e000138–e000138. 7 indexed citations
2.
Glasner, Tina, et al.. (2022). The future of chaplaincy in a secularized society: a mixed-methods survey from the Netherlands. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 29(1). 132–144. 10 indexed citations
3.
Leget, Carlo, et al.. (2022). Spiritual conversation model for patients and loved ones in palliative care: a validation study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 14(4). 462–469. 5 indexed citations
4.
Zeeuw, Eveline L. de, et al.. (2016). Arithmetic, reading and writing performance has a strong genetic component: A study in primary school children. Learning and Individual Differences. 47. 156–166. 17 indexed citations
5.
Overbeek, Lucy, Lawrence Rozendaal, Tina Glasner, et al.. (2015). Chorionicity and Heritability Estimates from Twin Studies: The Prenatal Environment of Twins and Their Resemblance Across a Large Number of Traits. Behavior Genetics. 46(3). 304–314. 18 indexed citations
6.
Zeeuw, Eveline L. de, et al.. (2015). Childhood ODD and ADHD Behavior: The Effect of Classroom Sharing, Gender, Teacher Gender and Their Interactions. Behavior Genetics. 45(4). 394–408. 12 indexed citations
7.
Lugtig, Peter, Tina Glasner, & Anja J. Boevé. (2015). Reducing Underreports of Behaviors in Retrospective Surveys: The Effects of Three Different Strategies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 28(4). 583–595. 5 indexed citations
8.
Vaart, W. van der, Tina Glasner, & Robert F. Belli. (2014). Tailoring data collection methods to hard-to-examine populations: the use of life events as recall aids in survey research. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
9.
Zeeuw, Eveline L. de, Tina Glasner, Meike Bartels, et al.. (2014). Polygenic scores associated with educational attainment in adults predict educational achievement and ADHD symptoms in children. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics. 165(6). 510–520. 35 indexed citations
10.
Zeeuw, Eveline L. de, et al.. (2014). Do children perform and behave better at school when taught by same-gender teachers?. Learning and Individual Differences. 36. 152–156. 11 indexed citations
11.
Glasner, Tina, et al.. (2014). Calendar Instruments in Retrospective Web Surveys. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
12.
Glasner, Tina, et al.. (2013). [Multiple births in the Netherlands].. PubMed. 157(30). A5962–A5962. 7 indexed citations
13.
Glasner, Tina, et al.. (2013). Meerlinggeboorten in Nederland. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 157. 1–5. 2 indexed citations
14.
Glasner, Tina, W. van der Vaart, & Robert F. Belli. (2012). The use of landmark events as memory aids: Implications for international surveys. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
15.
Glasner, Tina, W. van der Vaart, & Robert F. Belli. (2012). Calendar Interviewing and the Use of Landmark Events – Implications for Cross-cultural Surveys. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. 115(1). 45–52. 12 indexed citations
16.
Vaart, W. van der & Tina Glasner. (2010). Personal Landmarks as Recall Aids in Survey Interviews. Field Methods. 23(1). 37–56. 28 indexed citations
17.
Glasner, Tina & W. van der Vaart. (2008). Cognitive processes in Event History Calendar interviews: A verbal report analysis. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2 indexed citations
18.
Vaart, W. van der, Tina Glasner, & Robert F. Belli. (2008). The Use of Landmark Events in EHC-Interviews to Enhance Recall Accuracy. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 6280–6293. 4 indexed citations
19.
Glasner, Tina & W. van der Vaart. (2007). Applications of calendar instruments in social surveys: a review. Quality & Quantity. 43(3). 333–349. 138 indexed citations
20.
Vaart, W. van der & Tina Glasner. (2007). Applying a timeline as a recall aid in a telephone survey: a record check study. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 21(2). 227–238. 50 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026