W. van der Vaart

692 total citations
34 papers, 462 citations indexed

About

W. van der Vaart is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, W. van der Vaart has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 462 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Health and 5 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in W. van der Vaart's work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (3 papers). W. van der Vaart is often cited by papers focused on Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (3 papers). W. van der Vaart collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. W. van der Vaart's co-authors include Tina Glasner, Wil Dijkstra, J. van der Zouwen, Anke Niehof, Robert F. Belli, Hilje van der Horst, Yfke Ongena, Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn, E. Mulder and Henk Rigter and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

W. van der Vaart

32 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
W. van der Vaart Netherlands	11	225	75	61	55	40	34	462
Tina Glasner Netherlands	10	133 0.6×	53 0.7×	51 0.8×	48 0.9×	25 0.6×	21	375
Bernadette Campbell United States	11	176 0.8×	81 1.1×	29 0.5×	48 0.9×	79 2.0×	15	422
Maria Fernandes‐Jesus Portugal	12	269 1.2×	126 1.7×	36 0.6×	110 2.0×	72 1.8×	50	497
Jacqueline Low Canada	11	162 0.7×	110 1.5×	32 0.5×	78 1.4×	39 1.0×	27	489
Melisa Choubak Canada	4	148 0.7×	95 1.3×	37 0.6×	75 1.4×	48 1.2×	5	341
David M. Keating United States	12	274 1.2×	101 1.3×	68 1.1×	66 1.2×	121 3.0×	30	543
David Weiss United States	9	127 0.6×	53 0.7×	36 0.6×	95 1.7×	74 1.9×	22	448
Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik Germany	11	277 1.2×	141 1.9×	82 1.3×	70 1.3×	61 1.5×	48	649
Jude P. Mikal United States	14	236 1.0×	75 1.0×	58 1.0×	72 1.3×	97 2.4×	29	470
Gina Wong‐Wylie Canada	5	158 0.7×	85 1.1×	35 0.6×	92 1.7×	89 2.2×	9	487

Countries citing papers authored by W. van der Vaart

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. van der Vaart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. van der Vaart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. van der Vaart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. van der Vaart

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. van der Vaart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. van der Vaart. The network helps show where W. van der Vaart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. van der Vaart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. van der Vaart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. van der Vaart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. van der Vaart. W. van der Vaart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Vaart, W. van der, et al.. (2025). The impact of religious identity on intergroup encounters. Archive for the Psychology of Religion.

Braam, Arjan W., et al.. (2024). Gerotranscendence as a Life Perspective Among Nursing Home Residents: A Qualitative Study Into Positive Ageing While Dependent on 24/7 Care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 81(5). 2546–2557. 1 indexed citations

Opdenakker, Marie‐Christine, et al.. (2023). Students’ academic engagement during COVID-19 times: a mixed-methods study into relatedness and loneliness during the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1221003–1221003. 9 indexed citations

Vaart, W. van der, et al.. (2022). Merged Methods: A Rationale for Full Integration. 7 indexed citations

Vaart, W. van der, et al.. (2018). Parental Participation in Juvenile Justice Institutions: Parents’ Perspectives on Facilitating and Hindering Factors. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 18(2). 124–137. 3 indexed citations

Niehof, Anke, et al.. (2017). History and Institutions in the Rebuilding of Social Capital after Forced Resettlement in the Philippines and Indonesia. The Journal of Development Studies. 54(8). 1392–1405. 3 indexed citations

Mulder, E., et al.. (2016). Family-Centered Care in Juvenile Justice Institutions: A Mixed Methods Study Protocol. JMIR Research Protocols. 5(3). e177–e177. 11 indexed citations

Vaart, W. van der. (2015). NARRATIVE COMPETENCE ACROSS THE LIFESPAN: AGE DIFFERENCES IN THE DESCRIPTION OF AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORIES. The Gerontologist. 55(Suppl_2). 490–490. 1 indexed citations

Vaart, W. van der, et al.. (2015). Can Third-party Help Improve Data Quality in Research Interviews? A Natural Experiment in a Hard-to-study Population. Field Methods. 27(4). 426–440. 7 indexed citations

10.

Vaart, W. van der, Tina Glasner, & Robert F. Belli. (2014). Tailoring data collection methods to hard-to-examine populations: the use of life events as recall aids in survey research. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations

11.

Niehof, Anke, et al.. (2013). Short-term risk experience of involuntary resettled households in the Philippines and Indonesia. Habitat International. 41. 165–175. 21 indexed citations

12.

Niehof, Anke, et al.. (2012). THE DISRUPTION AND REBUILDING OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IN THE PHILIPPINES AND INDONESIA. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 4(2). 307–323. 6 indexed citations

13.

Niehof, Anke, et al.. (2012). THE DISRUPTION AND REBUILDING OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IN THE PHILIPPINES AND INDONESIA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations

14.

Glasner, Tina, W. van der Vaart, & Robert F. Belli. (2012). The use of landmark events as memory aids: Implications for international surveys. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations

15.

Vaart, W. van der & Tina Glasner. (2010). Personal Landmarks as Recall Aids in Survey Interviews. Field Methods. 23(1). 37–56. 28 indexed citations

16.

Vaart, W. van der. (2009). Testing a Cue-list to Aid Attitude Recall in Surveys: A Field Experiment. Journal of Official Statistics. 25(3). 363–378. 1 indexed citations

17.

Glasner, Tina & W. van der Vaart. (2007). Applications of calendar instruments in social surveys: a review. Quality & Quantity. 43(3). 333–349. 138 indexed citations

18.

Vaart, W. van der & Tina Glasner. (2007). Applying a timeline as a recall aid in a telephone survey: a record check study. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 21(2). 227–238. 50 indexed citations

19.

Vaart, W. van der, Yfke Ongena, Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn, & Wil Dijkstra. (2005). Do Interviewers' Voice Characteristics Influence Cooperation Rates in Telephone Surveys?. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 18(4). 488–499. 19 indexed citations

20.

Vaart, W. van der. (2004). The time-line as a device to enhance recall in standardized research interviews: a split ballot study. Journal of Official Statistics. 20(2). 301–317. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact