Timothy W. Craven
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Oncology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Microbiology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Paul M. LevineRichard BonneauKent KirshenbaumDavid BakerXinting LiMatthew R. PrattParisa HosseinzadehStephen Rettie
- Topics
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (16 papers)Biochemical and Structural Characterization (5 papers)Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (5 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Timothy W. Craven
21 papers receiving 823 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Molecular Biology 711
- Organic Chemistry 292
- Oncology 105
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 105
- Microbiology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Timothy W. Craven
This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy W. Craven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy W. Craven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy W. Craven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy W. Craven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy W. Craven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy W. Craven. The network helps show where Timothy W. Craven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timothy W. Craven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timothy W. Craven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timothy W. Craven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Timothy W. Craven. Timothy W. Craven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 56 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 68 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 156 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Timothy W. Craven
Timothy W. Craven is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Molecular Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 832 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (16 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (5 papers) and Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (74 citations), Molecular Biology (711 citations) and Organic Chemistry (292 citations). Timothy W. Craven has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Paul M. Levine, Richard Bonneau, Kent Kirshenbaum, David Baker, Xinting Li, Matthew R. Pratt, Parisa Hosseinzadeh, Stephen Rettie, Vikram Khipple Mulligan and P. Douglas Renfrew. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.