Timo Leiter

878 total citations
8 papers, 147 citations indexed

About

Timo Leiter is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Timo Leiter has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 147 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Timo Leiter's work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (3 papers) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (3 papers). Timo Leiter is often cited by papers focused on Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (6 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (3 papers) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (3 papers). Timo Leiter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Austria. Timo Leiter's co-authors include Leendert van Bree, J.E.M. Klostermann, Mikael Hildén, Mike Harley, Anne Olhoff, Heather Jacobs, C. K. L. Davies, Alice B. M. Vadrot, Astrid Brousselle and Hannah Hughes and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Policy and Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

In The Last Decade

Timo Leiter

8 papers receiving 137 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Timo Leiter United Kingdom	7	74	59	41	23	22	8	147
Jeffrey Mazo United States	7	48 0.6×	131 2.2×	21 0.5×	18 0.8×	23 1.0×	24	224
Rhona Barr United Kingdom	5	75 1.0×	47 0.8×	31 0.8×	54 2.3×	27 1.2×	5	168
Justice Issah Musah-Surugu Jamaica	4	51 0.7×	41 0.7×	42 1.0×	19 0.8×	7 0.3×	4	133
Gabriela Nagle Alverio United States	8	41 0.6×	69 1.2×	21 0.5×	21 0.9×	27 1.2×	10	179
Bimal Raj Regmi Australia	10	125 1.7×	110 1.9×	94 2.3×	23 1.0×	27 1.2×	15	246
Kate Elizabeth Gannon United Kingdom	8	87 1.2×	51 0.9×	21 0.5×	31 1.3×	25 1.1×	12	190
Hannah R. Parker United Kingdom	6	201 2.7×	108 1.8×	42 1.0×	27 1.2×	18 0.8×	9	276
Luckson Zvobgo South Africa	6	60 0.8×	23 0.4×	35 0.9×	15 0.7×	26 1.2×	8	145
Ana Maria Vargas Falla Sweden	7	97 1.3×	84 1.4×	16 0.4×	29 1.3×	19 0.9×	15	261
Himani Upadhyay Germany	9	51 0.7×	214 3.6×	16 0.4×	29 1.3×	17 0.8×	13	284

Countries citing papers authored by Timo Leiter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timo Leiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timo Leiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timo Leiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timo Leiter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timo Leiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timo Leiter. The network helps show where Timo Leiter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timo Leiter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timo Leiter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timo Leiter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Timo Leiter. Timo Leiter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Leiter, Timo. (2023). Nationally determined contributions (NDCs) as a governance instrument – accounting for politics, negotiation progress, and related mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. Environmental Politics. 33(3). 552–557. 6 indexed citations

Leiter, Timo. (2022). Too Little, Too Slow? Climate Adaptation at the United Nations Climate Change Negotiations Since the Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Carbon & Climate Law Review. 16(4). 243–258. 10 indexed citations

Brousselle, Astrid, Eleanor Chelimsky, Timo Leiter, et al.. (2022). What should evaluation learn from COP 26? Views of evaluation practitioners. Evaluation. 28(1). 7–35. 7 indexed citations

Hughes, Hannah, Alice B. M. Vadrot, Jen Iris Allan, et al.. (2021). Global environmental agreement-making: Upping the methodological and ethical stakes of studying negotiations. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10. 100121–100121. 21 indexed citations

Leiter, Timo. (2021). Do governments track the implementation of national climate change adaptation plans? An evidence-based global stocktake of monitoring and evaluation systems. Environmental Science & Policy. 125. 179–188. 38 indexed citations

Leiter, Timo, et al.. (2019). Adaptation Metrics. Current Landscape and Evolving Practices. 14 indexed citations

Klostermann, J.E.M., et al.. (2015). Towards a framework to assess, compare and develop monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation in Europe. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 23(2). 187–209. 36 indexed citations

Leiter, Timo. (2015). Linking Monitoring and Evaluation of Adaptation to Climate Change Across Scales: Avenues and Practical Approaches. New Directions for Evaluation. 2015(147). 117–127. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact