Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! With a massive gap between rhetoric and reality, countries draft new climate commitments
202464 citationsAnne Olhoff, Chris Bataille et al.IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Olhoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Olhoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Olhoff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Olhoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Olhoff. The network helps show where Anne Olhoff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Olhoff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Olhoff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Olhoff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Olhoff. Anne Olhoff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Olhoff, Anne, Chris Bataille, John M. Christensen, et al.. (2024). Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! With a massive gap between rhetoric and reality, countries draft new climate commitments. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).64 indexed citations breakdown →
Noble, Ian, et al.. (2014). A framework for identifying and measuring adaptation gaps. University of Twente Research Information. 5–17.1 indexed citations
12.
Olhoff, Anne, et al.. (2011). Technologies for Adaptation - Perspectives and Practical Experiences.21 indexed citations
13.
Trærup, Sara Lærke Meltofte, et al.. (2011). Technologies for Adaptation - Perspectives and Practical Experiences - Editorial.1 indexed citations
14.
Trærup, Sara Lærke Meltofte & Anne Olhoff. (2011). Climate Risk Screening Tools: A Guide to the Guidance.
15.
Olhoff, Anne, et al.. (2010). Screening Tools and Guidelines to Support the Mainstreaming of Climate Change Adaptation into Development Assistance: A Stocktaking Report.33 indexed citations
16.
Halsnæs, Kirsten, Amit Garg, Anne Olhoff, & Fatma Denton. (2006). Practical guidance material for the development, energy and climate country studies.5 indexed citations
Olhoff, Anne, et al.. (2004). CDM: Sustainable Development Impacts.29 indexed citations
19.
Olhoff, Anne, Anil Markandya, Kirsten Halsnæs, & Tim Taylor. (2004). CDM sustainable development impacts. Developed for the UNEP project 'CD4CDM'. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).8 indexed citations
20.
Halsnæs, Kirsten & Anne Olhoff. (2002). Proceedings from the Sustainable Development and Climate Change Workshop.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.