Tim Gill

875 total citations
10 papers, 587 citations indexed

About

Tim Gill is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Tim Gill has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 587 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 2 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Tim Gill's work include Children's Rights and Participation (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). Tim Gill is often cited by papers focused on Children's Rights and Participation (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). Tim Gill collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Iran. Tim Gill's co-authors include Bridget Kelly, Becky Freeman, Lesley King, Reza Amani, Louise A. Baur, Kathy Chapman, Jenny L. Gibson, Simon Chapman, Marcus Grant and Ariane De Lannoy and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Public Health, Public Health Nutrition and School Mental Health.

In The Last Decade

Tim Gill

10 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Tim Gill Australia	8	198	167	159	117	86	10	587
Birgitta L. Baker United States	15	279 1.4×	123 0.7×	106 0.7×	178 1.5×	173 2.0×	25	725
Barry A. Garst United States	17	174 0.9×	49 0.3×	259 1.6×	439 3.8×	41 0.5×	92	945
Felicity Allen Australia	13	107 0.5×	130 0.8×	75 0.5×	136 1.2×	30 0.3×	40	659
Benjamin Hickerson United States	14	358 1.8×	69 0.4×	63 0.4×	180 1.5×	30 0.3×	43	632
Brendon Hyndman Australia	17	279 1.4×	102 0.6×	207 1.3×	160 1.4×	174 2.0×	60	771
Danielle Tracey Australia	17	172 0.9×	90 0.5×	340 2.1×	149 1.3×	68 0.8×	69	898
Bob Gidlow New Zealand	10	218 1.1×	88 0.5×	40 0.3×	168 1.4×	41 0.5×	24	615
Corliss Outley United States	13	208 1.1×	24 0.1×	166 1.0×	151 1.3×	68 0.8×	45	558
Joan Newman United States	18	263 1.3×	88 0.5×	245 1.5×	152 1.3×	150 1.7×	39	870
Nathan Reigner United States	9	134 0.7×	138 0.8×	114 0.7×	234 2.0×	20 0.2×	11	828

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Gill

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Gill

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Gill. The network helps show where Tim Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tim Gill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tim Gill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tim Gill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tim Gill. Tim Gill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Gill, Tim. (2021). Urban Playground: How Child-Friendly Planning and Design Can Save Cities. 2 indexed citations

2.

Brown, Caroline, et al.. (2019). Special issue: child-friendly cities. Cities & Health. 3(1-2). 1–7. 47 indexed citations

3.

Gill, Tim. (2019). Widening the bandwidth of child-friendly urban planning in cities. Cities & Health. 3(1-2). 59–67. 7 indexed citations

4.

Gibson, Jenny L., et al.. (2017). A Systematic Review of Research into the Impact of Loose Parts Play on Children’s Cognitive, Social and Emotional Development. School Mental Health. 9(4). 295–309. 73 indexed citations

5.

Kelly, Bridget, Becky Freeman, Lesley King, et al.. (2016). The normative power of food promotions: Australian children’s attachments to unhealthy food brands. Public Health Nutrition. 19(16). 2940–2948. 26 indexed citations

6.

Gill, Tim. (2014). The Benefits of Children's Engagement with Nature: A Systematic Literature Review. Children Youth and Environments. 24(2). 10–10. 153 indexed citations

7.

Gill, Tim. (2014). The Benefits of Children's Engagement with Nature: A Systematic Literature Review. Children Youth and Environments. 24(2). 10–34. 72 indexed citations

8.

Freeman, Becky, Bridget Kelly, Louise A. Baur, et al.. (2014). Digital Junk: Food and Beverage Marketing on Facebook. American Journal of Public Health. 104(12). e56–e64. 154 indexed citations

9.

Amani, Reza & Tim Gill. (2013). Shiftworking, nutrition and obesity: implications for workforce health- a systematic review.. PubMed. 22(4). 505–15. 51 indexed citations

10.

Gill, Tim. (2006). Home Zones in the UK: History, Policy and Impact on Children and Youth. Children Youth and Environments. 16(1). 90–103. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact