Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers
This map shows the geographic impact of Tijs Neutens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tijs Neutens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tijs Neutens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tijs Neutens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tijs Neutens. The network helps show where Tijs Neutens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tijs Neutens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tijs Neutens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tijs Neutens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tijs Neutens. Tijs Neutens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Farber, Steven, Morton E. O’Kelly, Harvey J. Miller, & Tijs Neutens. (2016). Measuring Segregation Using Patterns of Daily Travel Behavior: A Social Interaction-Based Model of Exposure. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
Baets, Bernard De, et al.. (2015). A Qualitative Approach to the Identification, Visualisation and Interpretation of Repetitive Motion Patterns in Groups of Moving Point Objects. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology. 12(5). 415–423.1 indexed citations
Kwan, Mei‐Po & Tijs Neutens. (2014). Space-time research in GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 28(5). 851–854.40 indexed citations
9.
Widener, Michael J., Steven Farber, Tijs Neutens, & Mark W. Horner. (2013). Using urban commuting data to calculate a spatiotemporal accessibility measure for healthy food environment studies. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Boussauw, Kobe, Tijs Neutens, & Frank Witlox. (2010). Spatial variations of the minimum home-to-work distance in the north of Belgium. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
16.
Versichele, Mathias, Matthias Delafontaine, Tijs Neutens, & Nico Van de Weghe. (2010). Potential and Implications of Bluetooth Proximity-Based Tracking in Moving Object Research. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 111–116.7 indexed citations
17.
Maeyer, Philippe De, et al.. (2009). Proceedings of the 4th International workshop on 3D Geo-Information. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).5 indexed citations
18.
Neutens, Tijs & Philippe De Maeyer. (2009). Sustainable development of territories: GIS theory and practice. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
19.
Neutens, Tijs, et al.. (2008). The impact of opening hours on individual accessibility: a case study in the context of accessibility to registry offices. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.