Thorsten Vetter
- Nephrology top 10%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 5
-
- Magnesium in Health and Disease 1
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 10
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 4
-
- Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods 4
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 1
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 1
-
- Intellectual Property and Patents 1
- Co-authors
- Martin J. LohseJan RegnströmRobert HemmingsFranz KoenigMartin PoschSpiros VamvakasMatthias P. HoferFalk Ehmann
- Journals
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (3 papers)Frontiers in Pharmacology (2 papers)npj Digital Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Thorsten Vetter
12 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Nephrology 66
- Statistics and Probability 65
- Nutrition and Dietetics 66
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 8
- Economics and Econometrics 96
Countries citing papers authored by Thorsten Vetter
This map shows the geographic impact of Thorsten Vetter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thorsten Vetter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thorsten Vetter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thorsten Vetter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thorsten Vetter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thorsten Vetter. The network helps show where Thorsten Vetter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thorsten Vetter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 115 |
About Thorsten Vetter
Thorsten Vetter is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics and Nephrology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (5 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (1 paper), Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper) and Magnesium in Health and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (66 citations), Statistics and Probability (65 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (66 citations). Thorsten Vetter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. Lohse, Jan Regnström, Robert Hemmings, Franz Koenig, Martin Posch, Spiros Vamvakas, Matthias P. Hofer, Falk Ehmann, Marisa Papaluca‐Amati and Amelie Elsäßer. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Frontiers in Pharmacology, npj Digital Medicine, Drug Discovery Today and Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.