Scott Askin
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 3
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 3
- Co-authors
- Armin Ritzhaupt (2 shared papers)Francesca Cerreta (2 shared papers)Anthonius de Boer (1 shared paper)Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez (1 shared paper)Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel (1 shared paper)Helga Gardarsdóttir (1 shared paper)Mira G. P. Zuidgeest (1 shared paper)Tim De Smedt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- npj Digital Medicine (1 paper)BMC Medical Research Methodology (1 paper)Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1 paper)Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (1 paper)Health and Technology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Scott Askin
5 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Health Informatics 68
- Health Information Management 29
- Statistics and Probability 23
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 76
- Applied Psychology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Askin
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Askin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Askin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Askin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Askin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Askin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Askin. The network helps show where Scott Askin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Scott Askin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 132 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 32 |
About Scott Askin
Scott Askin is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Economics and Econometrics, Immunology and Molecular Biology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (1 paper), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (1 paper) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (68 citations), Health Information Management (29 citations), Statistics and Probability (23 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (76 citations) and Applied Psychology (13 citations). Scott Askin has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Armin Ritzhaupt, Francesca Cerreta, Anthonius de Boer, Yared Santa‐Ana‐Téllez, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel, Helga Gardarsdóttir, Mira G. P. Zuidgeest, Tim De Smedt, Spiros Vamvakas and Dionisio Acosta. Their work appears in journals such as npj Digital Medicine, BMC Medical Research Methodology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery and Health and Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.