Thorne Shipley

1.1k citations
60 papers · 826 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thorne Shipley

54 papers receiving 731 citations

Peers

Thorne Shipley
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 622
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 197
  • Sensory Systems 56
  • General Psychology 12
  • Ophthalmology 72
Replace Neil R. Bartlett with:
Neil R. Bartlett United States
Glenn E. Meyer United States
H. W. Leibowitz United States
R. Frank Quick United States
Hermann L. F. Helmholtz Italy
Walter H. Ehrenstein Germany
Lawrence E. Arend United States
Gerald M. Murch United States
H. Richard Blackwell United States
Theodore E. Parks United States
Thorne Shipley relative to Neil R. Bartlett United States Neil R. Bartlett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Neil R. Bartlett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thorne Shipley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thorne Shipley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thorne Shipley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thorne Shipley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thorne Shipley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thorne Shipley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thorne Shipley. The network helps show where Thorne Shipley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Thorne Shipley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thorne Shipley Line = papers co-authored together Thorne Shipley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1964157
2
CLASSICS IN PSYCHOLOGY.
196175
3 197060
4 196547
5 196945
6 196641
7 196532
8 196829
9 197028
10 195726
11 195826
12 196625
13 197214
14 196914
15 195714
16 197114
17 196911
18 196411
19 196610
20 195910

About Thorne Shipley

Thorne Shipley is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 60 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (30 papers), Color Science and Applications (5 papers), Color perception and design (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (622 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (197 citations), Sensory Systems (56 citations), General Psychology (12 citations) and Ophthalmology (72 citations). Thorne Shipley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Roy Jones, Amelia R. Fry, Kenneth N. Ogle, Marion C. Hyson, J. Lawton Smith, Craig C. Wier, L Cigánek, Thomas J. Walsh, David R. Williams and Philip J. Kellman. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Documenta Ophthalmologica, Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Pattern Recognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact