Thomas W. Smith
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education
- Philosophy top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Co-authors
- Robert D. HoltStephen W. PacalaJianguo LiuSandra CourterJohn JenkinsCatherine PesceM. HarveyG.A. Moses
- Topics
- Medieval History and Crusades (9 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (8 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas W. Smith
41 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Political Science and International Relations 156
- Sociology and Political Science 138
- Education 52
- Philosophy 48
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 35
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas W. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Smith. Thomas W. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Love of the Good as the Cure for Spiritedness in Plato’s Republic | 0 |
| 10 | Tolkien's catholic imagination : Mediation and tradition | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Augustine and Liberal Education | 1 |
| 13 | The politics of conditionality: The European Union and human rights in Turkey. | 2 |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | SITE SAFETY : RIGHTS, RISKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES | 6 |
| 16 | Gravel Mining Impacts on San Benito River, California | 1 |
| 17 | TIJUANA RIVER CROSSING USING HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING: A CASE HISTORY | 1 |
| 18 | Michael Oakeshott on history, practice and political theory | 2 |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | Household energy game | 3 |
About Thomas W. Smith
Thomas W. Smith is a scholar working on Classics, History and Philosophy, having authored 56 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval History and Crusades (9 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (8 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (156 citations), Philosophy (48 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (138 citations). Thomas W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Holt, Stephen W. Pacala, Jianguo Liu, Sandra Courter, John Jenkins, Catherine Pesce, M. Harvey, G.A. Moses, Katharine Yao and Katherine Kopkash. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Ecological Applications and The American Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.