Thomas W. Lin

1.3k total citations
37 papers, 899 citations indexed

About

Thomas W. Lin is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Accounting and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas W. Lin has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 899 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Management Information Systems, 11 papers in Accounting and 10 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Thomas W. Lin's work include Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (7 papers). Thomas W. Lin is often cited by papers focused on Accounting and Organizational Management (10 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (7 papers). Thomas W. Lin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and China. Thomas W. Lin's co-authors include Wim A. Van der Stede, Chee W. Chow, Edward Blocher, Kung H. Chen, Wen-Hsien Tsai, Yu Tang, Jun-Der Leu, Wei Hsu, Kenneth A. Merchant and Siqi Li and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, International Journal of Production Research and Journal of Intellectual Capital.

In The Last Decade

Thomas W. Lin

37 papers receiving 780 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas W. Lin United States	16	429	345	297	170	116	37	899
Daniel Oyon Switzerland	12	448 1.0×	503 1.5×	336 1.1×	117 0.7×	161 1.4×	25	1000
Magdy G. Abdel-Kader United Kingdom	16	413 1.0×	612 1.8×	430 1.4×	131 0.8×	107 0.9×	53	1.1k
Maurice Gosselin Canada	11	330 0.8×	693 2.0×	397 1.3×	164 1.0×	108 0.9×	22	993
Regine Slagmulder Belgium	14	440 1.0×	530 1.5×	214 0.7×	214 1.3×	68 0.6×	42	984
Anthony A. Atkinson Canada	9	395 0.9×	572 1.7×	242 0.8×	178 1.0×	159 1.4×	16	983
Mike Tayles United Kingdom	18	692 1.6×	808 2.3×	501 1.7×	175 1.0×	128 1.1×	29	1.3k
H. Thomas Johnson United States	11	265 0.6×	598 1.7×	214 0.7×	182 1.1×	131 1.1×	21	887
Stephen C. Hansen United States	12	287 0.7×	554 1.6×	370 1.2×	121 0.7×	84 0.7×	28	908
Peter C. Brewer United States	15	455 1.1×	747 2.2×	407 1.4×	182 1.1×	70 0.6×	42	1.3k
Anette Mikes United Kingdom	12	366 0.9×	371 1.1×	654 2.2×	124 0.7×	177 1.5×	32	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Lin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Lin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Lin. The network helps show where Thomas W. Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Lin. Thomas W. Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Zhang, Chuan, et al.. (2013). Market Competition and the Use of Performance Measures in Chinese Firms. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 24(3). 65–70. 1 indexed citations

Tsai, Wen-Hsien, et al.. (2013). A product-mix decision model using green manufacturing technologies under activity-based costing. Journal of Cleaner Production. 57. 178–187. 54 indexed citations

Stede, Wim A. Van der, Chee W. Chow, & Thomas W. Lin. (2011). Strategy, Choice of Performance Measures, and Performance. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 4 indexed citations

Merchant, Kenneth A., et al.. (2011). Performance Measurement and Incentive Compensation: An Empirical Analysis and Comparison of Chinese and Western Firms’ Practices. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

Chen, Rongjie, et al.. (2011). Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance among Chinese Securities Firms. 28(3). 789. 7 indexed citations

Tang, Yu & Thomas W. Lin. (2010). Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to the lead-free equipment selection decision. International Journal of Business and Systems Research. 5(1). 35–35. 33 indexed citations

Chen, Shu‐Ping, et al.. (2009). A study of the selection criteria for enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Business and Systems Research. 3(4). 456–456. 8 indexed citations

Lin, Thomas W., et al.. (2008). Activity-based costing popularity in China. Journal of cost management. 22(3). 40–48. 7 indexed citations

Su, Wenbin, et al.. (2008). The use of financial and nonfinancial performance measures in chinese firms. Journal of cost management. 22(5). 37–46. 8 indexed citations

10.

Hu, Yiming & Thomas W. Lin. (2008). Accuracy of the Qualitative Reports of Financial Analysts: A Chinese Study. 25(2). 353. 1 indexed citations

11.

Geng, Wang, et al.. (2007). Integrating the quality cost report and TQM tools to achieve competitive advantage. Journal of cost management. 21(1). 42–47. 2 indexed citations

12.

Stede, Wim A. Van der, Chee W. Chow, & Thomas W. Lin. (2006). Strategy, Choice of Performance Measures, and Performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 18(1). 185–205. 230 indexed citations

13.

Merchant, Kenneth A., et al.. (2005). Target costing and incentive compensation. Journal of cost management. 19(2). 29–42. 7 indexed citations

14.

Lin, Thomas W.. (2005). OEC Management-Control System Helps China Haier Group Achieve Competitive Advantage. Management accounting quarterly. 6(3). 1. 3 indexed citations

15.

Wang, Pingxin, et al.. (2005). How an ABC study helped a china state-owned company stay competitive. Journal of cost management. 19(6). 39–47. 4 indexed citations

16.

Lin, Thomas W.. (2005). OEC Management-Control System Helps China Haier Group Achieve Competitive Advantage; the Combination of a New Corporate Culture That Emphasizes Excellence, a Changed Business Strategy, and a Management-Control System of Work Rules and Discipline Turned a Nearly Bankrupt Company into a Success. Management accounting quarterly. 6(3). 1. 2 indexed citations

17.

Lin, Thomas W.. (2004). Corporate Governance in China: Recent Developments, Key Problems, and Suggested Solutions. 1(1). 1–23. 3 indexed citations

18.

Blocher, Edward, Kung H. Chen, & Thomas W. Lin. (2000). MANAJEMEN BIAYA: Dengan Tekanan Stratejik. UAJY Repository (University of Southampton). 6 indexed citations

19.

Dudewicz, Edward J., Thomas W. Lin, & Charles W. Swenson. (1992). Stronger Tests Using Heteroscedastic Anova with Simulations of Accounting Systems. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences. 12(4). 277–299. 1 indexed citations

20.

Watkins, Paul R., Thomas W. Lin, & Daniel E. O’Leary. (1992). AI integration for enhanced decision support. 133–144 vol.3. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact