Thomas W. Lee

688 citations
9 papers · 521 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas W. Lee

9 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Thomas W. Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 289
  • Public Administration 32
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 17
  • General Decision Sciences 13
Replace Nancy G. Dodd with:
Nancy G. Dodd United States
Yongqing Fang Singapore
Robert B. Tiegs United States
Ralph Katerberg United States
Joseph M. Goodman United States
Linda Parrack Livingstone United States
Robert Knoop Canada
Patricia M. Fandt United States
Suresh Srivastva United States
Daniel G. Spencer United States
Thomas W. Lee relative to Nancy G. Dodd United States Nancy G. Dodd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nancy G. Dodd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Lee. The network helps show where Thomas W. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Thomas W. Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas W. Lee Line = papers co-authored together Thomas W. Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1992167
2 1989118
3
Goal setting theory and job performance.
198987
4 201759
5 198254
6 199214
7 198611
8 20056
9 19895

About Thomas W. Lee

Thomas W. Lee is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems and Management, having authored 9 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (1 paper), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (1 paper) and Employer Branding and e-HRM (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (289 citations), Public Administration (32 citations), Applied Psychology (40 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (17 citations) and General Decision Sciences (13 citations). Thomas W. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Richard T. Mowday, James P. Walsh, Susan J. Ashford, June G. Morita, Edwin A. Locke, Gary P. Latham, Peter W. Hom, Marion B. Eberly, Mark S. Turbin and James R. Terborg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management, Organizational Dynamics, Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society and Academy of Management Proceedings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact