Thomas W. Lee

684 total citations
9 papers, 519 citations indexed

About

Thomas W. Lee is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Communication and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas W. Lee has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 519 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 1 paper in Communication and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas W. Lee's work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper). Thomas W. Lee is often cited by papers focused on Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper). Thomas W. Lee collaborates with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Thomas W. Lee's co-authors include Richard T. Mowday, James P. Walsh, Susan J. Ashford, June G. Morita, Edwin A. Locke, Gary P. Latham, Peter W. Hom, Marion B. Eberly, G. A. Davis and Frank Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management and Organizational Dynamics.

In The Last Decade

Thomas W. Lee

9 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas W. Lee United States	7	290	127	85	78	55	9	519
Linda Parrack Livingstone United States	7	376 1.3×	125 1.0×	95 1.1×	70 0.9×	83 1.5×	12	583
Brendan D. Bannister United States	11	170 0.6×	106 0.8×	88 1.0×	40 0.5×	71 1.3×	16	443
Nancy G. Dodd United States	10	388 1.3×	182 1.4×	107 1.3×	44 0.6×	66 1.2×	12	606
Jai Ghorpade United States	12	186 0.6×	184 1.4×	133 1.6×	96 1.2×	42 0.8×	32	591
Donald J. Vredenburgh United States	14	327 1.1×	155 1.2×	149 1.8×	90 1.2×	66 1.2×	22	588
Janet F. Schriesheim United States	6	255 0.9×	124 1.0×	81 1.0×	37 0.5×	54 1.0×	12	505
John P. Campbell United States	5	241 0.8×	143 1.1×	86 1.0×	28 0.4×	31 0.6×	9	496
Jeannette Zempel Germany	3	430 1.5×	205 1.6×	117 1.4×	65 0.8×	96 1.7×	5	666
Robert Waldersee Australia	10	300 1.0×	85 0.7×	159 1.9×	90 1.2×	125 2.3×	16	572
Ralph Katerberg United States	10	511 1.8×	216 1.7×	173 2.0×	120 1.5×	53 1.0×	17	743

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Lee

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Lee

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Lee. The network helps show where Thomas W. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Lee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Lee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Lee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Lee. Thomas W. Lee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Lee, Thomas W., et al.. (2017). Managing employee retention and turnover with 21st century ideas. Organizational Dynamics. 47(2). 88–98. 58 indexed citations

2.

Smith, Kenneth G. C., et al.. (2005). A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2005(1). 2–247. 6 indexed citations

3.

Lee, Thomas W., Susan J. Ashford, James P. Walsh, & Richard T. Mowday. (1992). Commitment Propensity, Organizational Commitment, and Voluntary Turnover: A Longitudinal Study of Organizational Entry Processes. Journal of Management. 18(1). 15–32. 166 indexed citations

4.

Peterson, Richard B., et al.. (1992). Strategies and Tactics in Union Organizing Campaigns. Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society. 31(2). 370–381. 14 indexed citations

5.

Lee, Thomas W., Edwin A. Locke, & Gary P. Latham. (1989). Goal setting theory and job performance.. 87 indexed citations

6.

Morita, June G., Thomas W. Lee, & Richard T. Mowday. (1989). Introducing survival analysis to organizational researchers: A selected application to turnover research.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74(2). 280–292. 5 indexed citations

7.

Morita, June G., Thomas W. Lee, & Richard T. Mowday. (1989). Introducing survival analysis to organizational researchers: A selected application to turnover research.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 74(2). 280–292. 118 indexed citations

8.

Mowday, Richard T. & Thomas W. Lee. (1986). The Influence of Propensity to Become Committed on the Development of Commitment and Prediction of Turnover During Organizational Entry.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 1986(1). 193–197. 11 indexed citations

9.

Terborg, James R., Thomas W. Lee, Frank Smith, G. A. Davis, & Mark S. Turbin. (1982). Extension of the Schmidt and Hunter validity generalization procedure to the prediction of absenteeism behavior from knowledge of job satisfaction and organizational commitment.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 67(4). 440–449. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact