Thomas W. Gillespie
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 5
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Climate variability and models 2
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 6
- Forest ecology and management 2
-
- Urban Green Space and Health 2
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
-
- Remote Sensing in Agriculture 2
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 2
- Avian ecology and behavior 1
- Co-authors
- Diane E. PatakiStéphanie PincetlG. Darrel JeneretteHeather R. McCarthyMeghan L. AvolioKatherine S. WillisChunyu DongPark Williams
- Journals
- Geophysical Research Letters (1 paper)Remote Sensing (3 papers)Ecological Indicators (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceAustralia
In The Last Decade
Thomas W. Gillespie
12 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Ecological Modeling 60
- Global and Planetary Change 190
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 98
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 94
- Environmental Engineering 81
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Gillespie
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Gillespie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Gillespie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Gillespie. The network helps show where Thomas W. Gillespie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas W. Gillespie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 73 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 81 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 37 |
About Thomas W. Gillespie
Thomas W. Gillespie is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Climate variability and models (2 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (60 citations), Global and Planetary Change (190 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (98 citations). Thomas W. Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Diane E. Pataki, Stéphanie Pincetl, G. Darrel Jenerette, Heather R. McCarthy, Meghan L. Avolio, Katherine S. Willis, Chunyu Dong, Park Williams, Glen M. MacDonald and Gregory S. Okin. Their work appears in journals such as Geophysical Research Letters, Remote Sensing and Ecological Indicators.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.