Natálie Čeplová
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 6
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 4
- Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna 2
- Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation 1
- Co-authors
- Zdeňka Lososová (7 shared papers)Veronika Kalusová (6 shared papers)Jiří Danihelka (5 shared papers)Karel Fajmon (4 shared papers)Vladimír Řehořek (4 shared papers)Lubomír Tichý (4 shared papers)Milan Chytrý (4 shared papers)Zdenka Preislerová (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Urban Ecosystems (2 papers)Preslia (2 papers)Journal of Biogeography (1 paper)Diversity and Distributions (1 paper)Journal of Vegetation Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaHungarySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Natálie Čeplová
8 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 125
- Ecological Modeling 39
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 97
- Global and Planetary Change 115
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 80
Countries citing papers authored by Natálie Čeplová
This map shows the geographic impact of Natálie Čeplová's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natálie Čeplová with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natálie Čeplová more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natálie Čeplová
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natálie Čeplová. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natálie Čeplová. The network helps show where Natálie Čeplová may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natálie Čeplová, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 93 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 5 | Phylogenetic diversity of central-European urban plant communities: effects of alien species and habitat types | 2015 | 26 |
| 6 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 11 |
About Natálie Čeplová
Natálie Čeplová is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (2 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (2 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (1 paper) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (125 citations), Ecological Modeling (39 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (97 citations), Global and Planetary Change (115 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (80 citations). Natálie Čeplová has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Hungary and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Zdeňka Lososová, Veronika Kalusová, Jiří Danihelka, Karel Fajmon, Vladimír Řehořek, Lubomír Tichý, Milan Chytrý, Zdenka Preislerová, Deana Láníková and Pavel Novák. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Ecosystems, Preslia, Journal of Biogeography, Diversity and Distributions and Journal of Vegetation Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.