Thomas Thelin
- Software top 1%
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research 18
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 12
- Information Systems top 1%
- Software Engineering Research 26
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 14
-
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life 9
- Infant Development and Preterm Care 7
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
-
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies 6
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 5
Thomas Thelin
55 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Software 454
- Information Systems 680
- Computer Science Applications 66
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 237
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Thelin
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Thelin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Thelin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Thelin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Thelin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Thelin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Thelin. The network helps show where Thomas Thelin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Thelin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 15 | |
| 4 | Tool support for usage-based reading | 2004 | 2 |
| 5 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 87 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 64 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 132 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 35 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 37 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 31 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 17 |
About Thomas Thelin
Thomas Thelin is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacy and Statistics and Probability, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (26 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (18 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (14 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (12 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (9 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (6 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (454 citations), Information Systems (680 citations), Computer Science Applications (66 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (237 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (66 citations). Thomas Thelin has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Per Runeson, Tomas Sveger, Claes Wohlin, Björn Regnell, Karin Sjöström, L. Valentin, Karel Maršál, T. F. McNeil, Carina Andersson and Martin Höst. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Paediatrica, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Empirical Software Engineering, IEEE Software and Early Human Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.