Thomas Teo

2.5k total citations
54 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Thomas Teo is a scholar working on General Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Teo has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in General Psychology, 24 papers in Social Psychology and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Teo's work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (29 papers), Social Representations and Identity (19 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers). Thomas Teo is often cited by papers focused on Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (29 papers), Social Representations and Identity (19 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (10 papers). Thomas Teo collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Malaysia and India. Thomas Teo's co-authors include Richard T. G. Walsh, Wade E. Pickren, Cor Baerveldt, Paul Stenner, Alexandra Rutherford, Dennis C. Wendt, Girishwar Misra, Jie Yang, Louise Sundararajan and Rachel Sing‐Kiat Ting and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Frontiers in Psychology and Review of General Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Teo

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Teo Canada	18	493	385	361	211	200	54	1.1k
Jill G. Morawski United States	17	310 0.6×	375 1.0×	240 0.7×	163 0.8×	105 0.5×	52	885
Sunil Bhatia United States	18	400 0.8×	92 0.2×	631 1.7×	204 1.0×	252 1.3×	44	1.2k
Don Locke United States	17	959 1.9×	110 0.3×	442 1.2×	562 2.7×	138 0.7×	90	1.7k
Charles Guignon United States	14	298 0.6×	90 0.2×	293 0.8×	261 1.2×	78 0.4×	34	1.2k
Ludwin E. Molina United States	22	735 1.5×	78 0.2×	1.1k 3.0×	246 1.2×	156 0.8×	36	1.6k
Christopher Bollas United Kingdom	17	255 0.5×	173 0.4×	235 0.7×	937 4.4×	43 0.2×	52	1.5k
David M. Wulff United States	10	538 1.1×	54 0.1×	662 1.8×	334 1.6×	57 0.3×	23	1.5k
Ruth Leys United States	13	376 0.8×	82 0.2×	545 1.5×	313 1.5×	54 0.3×	29	1.5k
Alan C. Elms United States	14	319 0.6×	151 0.4×	386 1.1×	148 0.7×	28 0.1×	26	901
Harry J. G. Kempen Netherlands	8	850 1.7×	35 0.1×	384 1.1×	437 2.1×	224 1.1×	9	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Teo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Teo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Teo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Teo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Teo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Teo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Teo. The network helps show where Thomas Teo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Teo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Teo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Teo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Teo. Thomas Teo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Misra, Girishwar, Louise Sundararajan, Thomas Teo, Rachel Sing‐Kiat Ting, & Jie Yang. (2025). Decolonial research practices from an indigenous psychology perspective: Critical contributions to knowledge.. American Psychologist. 80(8). 1171–1184.

Teo, Thomas. (2024). Subjectivity and method: Why psychology needs more armchair scholarship. Theory & Psychology. 34(3). 347–361. 2 indexed citations

Teo, Thomas. (2022). What Is a White Epistemology in Psychological Science? A Critical Race-Theoretical Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 861584–861584. 15 indexed citations

Teo, Thomas. (2022). The mentality of dieability/killability: Reflections on the special issue on law, medicine, and bioethics.. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. 42(4). 247–251. 1 indexed citations

Teo, Thomas & Dennis C. Wendt. (2020). Some clarifications on critical and Indigenous psychologies. Theory & Psychology. 30(3). 371–376. 7 indexed citations

Teo, Thomas. (2020). Subhumanism: The re‐emergence of an affective‐symbolic ontology in the migration debate and beyond. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 50(2). 132–148. 10 indexed citations

Teo, Thomas. (2020). Theorizing in psychology: From the critique of a hyper-science to conceptualizing subjectivity. Theory & Psychology. 30(6). 759–767. 12 indexed citations

Teo, Thomas. (2018). Homo neoliberalus: From personality to forms of subjectivity. Theory & Psychology. 28(5). 581–599. 60 indexed citations

Teo, Thomas. (2015). Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance.. American Psychologist. 70(3). 243–254. 108 indexed citations

10.

Teo, Thomas. (2015). Are psychological “ethics codes” morally oblique?. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. 35(2). 78–89. 14 indexed citations

11.

Teo, Thomas. (2013). Backlash against American psychology: An indigenous reconstruction of the history of German critical psychology.. History of Psychology. 16(1). 1–18. 21 indexed citations

12.

Teo, Thomas. (2010). Book Review: Michael Billig, The Hidden Roots of Critical Psychology: Understanding the Impact of Locke, Shaftesbury and Reid. London: Sage, 2008. History of the Human Sciences. 23(4). 109–112. 1 indexed citations

13.

Teo, Thomas. (2009). Psychology without Caucasians.. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. 50(2). 91–97. 10 indexed citations

14.

Teo, Thomas. (2007). Local institutionalization, discontinuity, and German textbooks of psychology, 1816–1854. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 43(2). 135–157. 3 indexed citations

15.

Teo, Thomas, et al.. (2005). The Critique of Psychology. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks. 2 indexed citations

16.

Teo, Thomas. (2003). Wilhelm Dilthey (1833-1911) and Eduard Spranger (1882-1963) on the developing person.. The Humanistic Psychologist. 31(1). 74–94. 10 indexed citations

17.

Teo, Thomas. (2002). Friedrich Albert Lange on neo‐Kantianism, socialist Darwinism, and a psychology without a soul. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 38(3). 285–301. 6 indexed citations

18.

Teo, Thomas. (2000). History Is Beautiful!. Contemporary Psychology. 45(1). 60–62. 1 indexed citations

19.

Teo, Thomas. (1998). Klaus Holzkamp and the rise and decline of German critical psychology.. History of Psychology. 1(3). 235–253. 17 indexed citations

20.

Teo, Thomas. (1995). Variability in Structured Wholeness: Context Factors in L. Kohlberg's Data on the Development of Moral Judgment.. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 41(3). 381–393. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact