Ruth Leys

3.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
29 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Ruth Leys is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Leys has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ruth Leys's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers). Ruth Leys is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (4 papers). Ruth Leys collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ruth Leys's co-authors include Marlene Goldman, William Ian Miller and Rand B. Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Emotion Review.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Leys

27 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

The Turn to Affect: A Critique 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400

Peers

Ruth Leys
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Sociology and Political Science 545
  • Social Psychology 376
  • Clinical Psychology 313
  • Literature and Literary Theory 222
  • History 213
Replace Cathy Caruth with:
Cathy Caruth United States
Shoshana Felman United States
Robert A. Nye United States
Sidonie Smith United States
James Strachey
Paul John Eakin United States
Jerome Neu United States
Robert Bernasconi United States
Peggy Phelan United States
Richard Kearney United States
Cathy Caruth United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ruth Leys
Ruth Leys · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ruth Leys
Ruth Leys · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Leys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Leys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Leys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Leys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Leys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Leys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Leys. The network helps show where Ruth Leys may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Leys

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Leys. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Leys based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Leys. Ruth Leys is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 4
3 7
4
The Turn to Affect: A Critique breakdown →
482
5 11
6 30
7 0
8 9
9 62
10 8
11
Trauma: A Genealogy
276
12 5
13 35
14 38
15 5
16 17
17
From sympathy to reflex : Marshall Hall and his opponents
11
18 16
19 11
20
Background to the reflex controversy: William Alison and the doctrine of sympathy before Hall.
4

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026