Thomas Stewart
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Dermatology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Dermatology and Skin Diseases 4
- Co-authors
- Scott I. AbramsEmmanuelle WaubantP.-B. AnderssonAnn FryeKaren MillerPeter BacchettiR. SloanPatrick J. Wolf
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Dermatology (4 papers)Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (3 papers)Academic Medicine (3 papers)Dermatologic Surgery (3 papers)Neurology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas Stewart
52 papers receiving 920 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 72
- Dermatology 95
- Immunology 196
- Cancer Research 110
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 127
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Stewart
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Stewart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Stewart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Stewart. The network helps show where Thomas Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Stewart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 148 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 13 | Satisfied, Optimistic, yet Concerned: Parent Voices on the Third Year of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program | 2007 | 2 |
| 14 | Satisfied, Optimistic, Yet Concerned: Parent Voices on the Third Year of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program. SCDP Report 0702. | 2007 | 1 |
| 15 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 45 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 20 | COMPARISON OF IMPULSE AND 3 KILOHERTZ SINE WAVE SPARK TESTING, | 1967 | 0 |
About Thomas Stewart
Thomas Stewart is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Dermatology, Education, Emergency Medical Services and Small Animals, having authored 57 papers that have together received 985 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (9 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (7 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (4 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (3 papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (3 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (72 citations), Dermatology (95 citations), Immunology (196 citations), Cancer Research (110 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (127 citations). Thomas Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Scott I. Abrams, Emmanuelle Waubant, P.-B. Andersson, Ann Frye, Karen Miller, Peter Bacchetti, R. Sloan, Patrick J. Wolf, Lauren Gee and D Goodkin. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Dermatology, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Academic Medicine, Dermatologic Surgery and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.