Thomas Stelmack
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Joan A. StelmackRobert W. MassofJanet P. SzlykRyan T. WilliamsJudith Babcock‐ParzialeDavid GreenbergCaroline K. RossA Barrada
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Stelmack
22 papers receiving 644 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Epidemiology 455
- Ophthalmology 398
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 174
- Cognitive Neuroscience 116
- Neurology 67
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Stelmack
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Stelmack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Stelmack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Stelmack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Stelmack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Stelmack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Stelmack. The network helps show where Thomas Stelmack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Stelmack
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Stelmack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Stelmack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Stelmack. Thomas Stelmack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | |
| 2 | Relationship of Psychological Factors to Success in Vision Rehabilitation | 1 |
| 3 | 67 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | 114 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | Measuring low-vision rehabilitation outcomes with the NEI VFQ-25. | 134 |
| 9 | Sensitivity of the VA LV VFQ-48 to Change after Low Vision Rehabilitation | 1 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | Toxicity of intravitreal antiviral drugs. | 13 |
| 19 | Toxicity of antineoplastic drug combinations in vitrectomy infusion fluid. | 8 |
| 20 | 25 |
About Thomas Stelmack
Thomas Stelmack is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 680 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (9 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (398 citations), Epidemiology (455 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (174 citations). Thomas Stelmack has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joan A. Stelmack, Robert W. Massof, Janet P. Szlyk, Ryan T. Williams, Judith Babcock‐Parziale, David Greenberg, Caroline K. Ross, A Barrada, Richard G. Fiscella and Gholam A. Peyman. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Vascular Surgery and Maturitas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.