N A Frost
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- J M SparrowT. J. PetersRichard A. ArmstrongMichael BensonJenny DonovanST BrookesA R RosenthalTze Lai
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (14 papers)Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (9 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
N A Frost
22 papers receiving 684 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Ophthalmology 526
- Epidemiology 368
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 313
- Cognitive Neuroscience 63
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 46
Countries citing papers authored by N A Frost
This map shows the geographic impact of N A Frost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N A Frost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N A Frost more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N A Frost
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N A Frost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N A Frost. The network helps show where N A Frost may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N A Frost
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N A Frost. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N A Frost based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N A Frost. N A Frost is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 56 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 38 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | Associations of human crystalline lens retrodots and waterclefts with visual impairment: an observational study. | 18 |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 141 | |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | [Barbiturates and systolic time intervals. A comparison between the immediate effects of thiopentone and methohexitone]. | 2 |
| 20 | 7 |
About N A Frost
N A Frost is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 22 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (14 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (9 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (526 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (313 citations) and Epidemiology (368 citations). N A Frost has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include J M Sparrow, T. J. Peters, Richard A. Armstrong, Michael Benson, Jenny Donovan, ST Brookes, A R Rosenthal, Tze Lai, Douglas J. Coster and Johnny Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Eye.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.