Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Agency Costs and Ownership Structure
20001.7k citationsJames S. Ang, Rebel A. Cole et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Ang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Ang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Ang more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Ang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Ang. The network helps show where James S. Ang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James S. Ang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James S. Ang.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James S. Ang based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James S. Ang. James S. Ang is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ang, James S., Rebel A. Cole, & Daniel B. Lawson. (2010). The role of owner in capital structure decisions: An analysis of single-owner corporations. Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University). 14(3). 1–36.20 indexed citations
6.
Ang, James S. & Yingmei Cheng. (2005). Financial Innovations and Market Efficiency: The Case for Single Stock Futures. 15(1). 38.12 indexed citations
Ang, James S., et al.. (2003). BUILDING TRACKING PORTFOLIOS BASED ON A GENERALIZED INFORMATION CRITERION. Statistica Sinica. 13(4). 1075–1096.1 indexed citations
9.
Ranganathan, C., et al.. (2001). Facilitators and Inhibitors for Deploying Business-to-Business E-Commerce Applications: A Multi-Method, Cross-Cultural Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 593–600.16 indexed citations
Lim, Kian Guan, et al.. (1997). Managing Crude Oil Price Risks Using Brent Futures. Energy.1 indexed citations
12.
Ang, James S. & Ali M Fatemi. (1997). Personal Bankruptcy Costs. Financial Services Review. 6(2). 77–96.1 indexed citations
13.
Fatemi, Ali M & James S. Ang. (1995). The Alignment of Management and Employee Compensations: The Case of U.K. Firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 5.3 indexed citations
14.
Ang, James S.. (1993). On financial ethics. Financial Management. 22(3). 32–59.8 indexed citations
15.
Ang, James S., et al.. (1993). The role of the Singapore government in national computerisation.. European Conference on Information Systems. 33(8-9). 39–47.
Ang, James S.. (1987). Do dividends matter? : a review of corporate dividend theories and evidence.30 indexed citations
18.
Fatemi, Ali M, James S. Ang, & Jess H. Chua. (1982). How to use Akaike Criterion to Automatically Specify and Construct Box Jenkins Models. The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University). 1(3).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.