Thomas Rohkrämer

423 citations
20 papers · 91 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Rohkrämer

14 papers receiving 56 citations

Peers

Thomas Rohkrämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • History 21
  • Political Science and International Relations 44
  • History and Philosophy of Science 6
  • Philosophy 12
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 5
Replace Lucien Jaume with:
Lucien Jaume France
Stefania Tutino United States
John T. Graham United States
Saul Kelly China
Ioannis D. Evrigenis United States
Howell A. Lloyd United Kingdom
Sean McMeekin United States
Henry Noel Brailsford
J. Drew Harrington United States
William Philpott United Kingdom
Thomas Rohkrämer relative to Lucien Jaume France Lucien Jaume's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lucien Jaume · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Rohkrämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Rohkrämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Rohkrämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Rohkrämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Rohkrämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Rohkrämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Rohkrämer. The network helps show where Thomas Rohkrämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Rohkrämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Rohkrämer Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Rohkrämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Eine andere Moderne? : Zivilisationskritik, Natur und Technik in Deutschland 1880-1933
199926
2 199914
3 199514
4 199012
5 20096
6 20074
7 20073
8 19993
9
Martin Heidegger, national socialism and environmentalism.
20053
10 20092
11
The environment and environmentalism
20151
12
August 1914 - Kriegsmentalität und ihre Voraussetzungen
19941
13 20021
14 20131
15 20070
16
Das Militär als Männerbund? : der Kult soldatischer Männlichkeit im Deutschen Kaiserreich
19950
17 20130
18 20100
19 20160
20 20130

About Thomas Rohkrämer

Thomas Rohkrämer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Urban Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 20 papers that have together received 91 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), European history and politics (3 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Central European national history (2 papers), German legal, social, and political studies (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Technology, Environment, Urban Planning (1 paper) and Urban Planning and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (21 citations), Political Science and International Relations (44 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations), Philosophy (12 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (5 citations). Thomas Rohkrämer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Paret. Their work appears in journals such as German History, Historische Zeitschrift, German Studies Review, History of European Ideas and Contemporary European History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact