Thomas P. Saine
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Anthropology
- Education
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey L. SammonsJohann Wolfgang von GœtheJane Κ. BrownGerhart HoffmeisterJohn G. GagliardoPaul HernadiNicholas SaulDaniel Steuer
- Topics
- German Literature and Culture Studies (5 papers)European Political History Analysis (4 papers)Communism, Protests, Social Movements (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Thomas P. Saine
21 papers receiving 96 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Sociology and Political Science 50
- Literature and Literary Theory 32
- Philosophy 27
- Anthropology 14
- Education 14
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas P. Saine
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas P. Saine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas P. Saine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas P. Saine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas P. Saine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas P. Saine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas P. Saine. The network helps show where Thomas P. Saine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas P. Saine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas P. Saine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas P. Saine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas P. Saine. Thomas P. Saine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Essays on Goethe | 4 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | From my life : Poetry and truth | 10 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | From my life , Poetry and truth : parts one to three | 6 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | Die ästhetische Theodizee : Karl Philipp Moritz und die Philosophie des 18. Jahrhunderts | 2 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 58 |
About Thomas P. Saine
Thomas P. Saine is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Classics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include German Literature and Culture Studies (5 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers) and Communism, Protests, Social Movements (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (11 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations) and Philosophy (27 citations). Thomas P. Saine has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey L. Sammons, Johann Wolfgang von Gœthe, Jane Κ. Brown, Gerhart Hoffmeister, John G. Gagliardo, Paul Hernadi, Nicholas Saul, Daniel Steuer, Eric A. Blackall and Robert M. Browning. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, The Modern Language Review and German Studies Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.