Thomas N. Johnson

577 total citations
9 papers, 441 citations indexed

About

Thomas N. Johnson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas N. Johnson has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 441 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Thomas N. Johnson's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Thomas N. Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Thomas N. Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas N. Johnson's co-authors include H. Enger Rosvold, Mortimer Mishkin, Patricia S. Goldman and Thelma W. Galkin and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Experimental Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Thomas N. Johnson

9 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas N. Johnson United States	9	217	194	97	53	47	9	441
Samuel G. Nord United States	12	148 0.7×	301 1.6×	45 0.5×	68 1.3×	56 1.2×	12	566
W J Friedlander United States	5	214 1.0×	165 0.9×	47 0.5×	48 0.9×	16 0.3×	7	412
Guillery Rw United Kingdom	6	222 1.0×	227 1.2×	30 0.3×	115 2.2×	32 0.7×	7	486
Verena M. Bucher Switzerland	8	215 1.0×	204 1.1×	27 0.3×	43 0.8×	24 0.5×	10	460
William W. Kaelber United States	16	245 1.1×	431 2.2×	160 1.6×	127 2.4×	50 1.1×	35	759
Toshio Kusama Japan	9	223 1.0×	257 1.3×	68 0.7×	118 2.2×	60 1.3×	12	620
W. R. Ingram United States	11	232 1.1×	336 1.7×	71 0.7×	120 2.3×	69 1.5×	22	717
Alfonso Llamas Spain	11	291 1.3×	227 1.2×	37 0.4×	26 0.5×	44 0.9×	16	449
Etsuro Kawana Japan	9	114 0.5×	186 1.0×	28 0.3×	50 0.9×	41 0.9×	16	354
Michael P. Biber United States	8	218 1.0×	121 0.6×	50 0.5×	75 1.4×	13 0.3×	10	436

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas N. Johnson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas N. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas N. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas N. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas N. Johnson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas N. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas N. Johnson. The network helps show where Thomas N. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas N. Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas N. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas N. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas N. Johnson. Thomas N. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Johnson, Thomas N., H. Enger Rosvold, Thelma W. Galkin, & Patricia S. Goldman. (1976). Postnatal maturation of subcortical projections from the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 166(4). 427–443. 13 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N. & H. Enger Rosvold. (1971). Topographic projections on the globus pallidus and the substantia nigra of selectively placed lesions in the precommissural caudate nucleus and putamen in the monkey. Experimental Neurology. 33(3). 584–596. 76 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N., H. Enger Rosvold, & Mortimer Mishkin. (1968). Projections from behaviorally-defined sectors of the prefrontal cortex to the basal ganglia, septum, and diencephalon of the monkey. Experimental Neurology. 21(1). 20–34. 169 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N.. (1965). An experimental study of the fornix and hypothalamo‐tegmental tracts in the cat. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 125(1). 29–39. 38 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N.. (1961). Fiber connections between the dorsal thalamus and corpus striatum in the cat. Experimental Neurology. 3(6). 556–569. 70 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N.. (1959). Studies on the brain of the guinea Pig. II. The olfactory tracts and fornix. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 112(1). 121–139. 18 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N.. (1957). Studies on the brain of the guinea pig. I. The nuclear pattern of certain basal telencephalic centers. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 107(3). 353–377. 27 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N.. (1957). The olfactory centers and connections in the cerebral hemisphere of the mole (scalopus aquaticus machrinus). The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 107(3). 379–425. 18 indexed citations

Johnson, Thomas N.. (1954). The superior and inferior colliculi of the mole (Scalopus aquaticus machrinus). The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 101(3). 765–799. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact