Thomas Meier

1.5k citations
30 papers · 1.0k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Meier

30 papers receiving 983 citations

Peers

Thomas Meier
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Condensed Matter Physics 250
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 415
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 513
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 219
  • Signal Processing 76
Replace Hung‐Yu Yang with:
Hung‐Yu Yang United States
B.K. Middleton United Kingdom
Hai Wang China
Simon John Greaves Japan
H. Hahn Germany
Bo Zheng China
Qiong Wu China
Bokuji Komiyama Japan
Zhongqi Pan United States
Thomas Meier relative to Hung‐Yu Yang United States Hung‐Yu Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.3×
Hung‐Yu Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Meier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Meier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Meier. The network helps show where Thomas Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Meier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Meier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Meier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998174
2 2014120
3 1999114
4 2017103
5 201696
6 199973
7 202060
8 202251
9 201741
10 201730
11 201526
12 201823
13 200320
14 201215
15 201714
16 200211
17 199910
18 20025
19 20243
20 20003

About Thomas Meier

Thomas Meier is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Signal Processing and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (12 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (7 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (7 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (7 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (6 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers) and Video Coding and Compression Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (250 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (415 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (513 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (219 citations) and Signal Processing (76 citations). Thomas Meier has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include King Ngi Ngan, C. H. Back, M. Kronseder, Martin Obstbaum, Martin Decker, Georg Woltersdorf, Hans G. Bauer, A. Bauer, C. Pfleiderer and Johannes Wild. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Physical review. B., Nature Communications, Applied Physics Letters and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact