Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet
20093.4k citationsS. Mühlbauer, Florian Jonietz et al.Scienceprofile →
Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals
20061.5k citationsC. Pfleiderer et al.Natureprofile →
Topological Hall Effect in theAPhase of MnSi
20091.2k citationsA. Neubauer, C. Pfleiderer et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Spin Transfer Torques in MnSi at Ultralow Current Densities
2010920 citationsFlorian Jonietz, S. Mühlbauer et al.Scienceprofile →
Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet
2012743 citationsA. Bauer, Christian Franz et al.profile →
Skyrmion lattice in the doped semiconductorFe1−xCoxSi
2010553 citationsW. Münzer, A. Neubauer et al.Physical Review Bprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Pfleiderer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Pfleiderer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Pfleiderer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Pfleiderer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Pfleiderer. The network helps show where C. Pfleiderer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Pfleiderer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Pfleiderer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Pfleiderer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with C. Pfleiderer. C. Pfleiderer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fobes, David, Tobias Weber, J. Waizner, et al.. (2018). Spin excitations of the skyrmion lattice in MnSi. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018.1 indexed citations
12.
Kindervater, J., Terry Adams, A. Bauer, et al.. (2018). Evolution of magnetocrystalline anisotropies in Mn$_{1-x}$Fe$_x$Si and Mn$_{1-x}$Co$_x$Si as observed in small-angle neutron scattering. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Friedemann, Sven, et al.. (2013). Ordinary and Intrinsic Anomalous {{Hall}} Effects in {{Nb}}${}_{1\ensuremath{-}y}${{Fe}}${}_{2+y}$. Physical Review B. 87(2). 24410.4 indexed citations
16.
Janoschek, M., et al.. (2012). Criticality Induced First-Order Phase Transition in Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Helimagnets. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2012.1 indexed citations
17.
Weber, F., et al.. (2006). EuZn 2 Sb 2 の低温特性と磁気秩序. Physical Review B. 73(1). 1–14427.21 indexed citations
18.
Löhneysen, H. v., et al.. (2003). Investigation of the quantum phase transition in CeCu6-xAux. Acta Physica Polonica B. 34(2). 707–720.4 indexed citations
19.
Vollmer, R., et al.. (2003). Low temperature specific heat of PrOs$_4$Sb$_12$. Acta Physica Polonica B. 34(2). 1185.1 indexed citations
20.
Carpenter, S.H. & C. Pfleiderer. (1994). Acoustic emission from AISI 4340 steel as a function of strength. 12. 141–148.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.