Thomas McClintock
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 4
- Planetary Science and Exploration 2
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
- Astro and Planetary Science 2
- Co-authors
- Anthony MadenCaroline FriendshipS. RutterEduardo RozoFulvio MeliaJoseph DeRoseJohn GunnRisa H. Wechsler
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2 papers)The British Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)Journal of Geophysical Research Planets (2 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (1 paper)The Astronomical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas McClintock
9 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Instrumentation 57
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 177
- Clinical Psychology 121
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 41
- Psychiatry and Mental health 42
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas McClintock
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas McClintock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas McClintock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas McClintock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas McClintock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas McClintock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas McClintock. The network helps show where Thomas McClintock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas McClintock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 66 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 33 |
About Thomas McClintock
Thomas McClintock is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Mathematics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (2 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (57 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (177 citations), Clinical Psychology (121 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (41 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (42 citations). Thomas McClintock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Maden, Caroline Friendship, S. Rutter, Eduardo Rozo, Fulvio Melia, Joseph DeRose, John Gunn, Risa H. Wechsler, Jeremy L. Tinker and Yao-Yuan Mao. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets, The Astrophysical Journal and The Astronomical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.