Caroline Friendship
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ruth E. MannAnthony R. BeechLouise FalshawDavid ThorntonRosie TraversLinda BludR. Karl HansonAnthony Beech
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (22 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (18 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers)
- Journals
- Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesThe British Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Interpersonal Violence
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Caroline Friendship
27 papers receiving 989 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
- Sociology and Political Science 840
- Gender Studies 104
- Psychiatry and Mental health 91
- Health 78
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Friendship
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Friendship's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Friendship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Friendship more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Friendship
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Friendship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Friendship. The network helps show where Caroline Friendship may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Friendship
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Friendship. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Friendship based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Friendship. Caroline Friendship is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 230 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 97 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Sexual offenders - measuring reconviction, reoffending and recidivism | 15 |
| 12 | 76 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | Reconviction as an Outcome Measure in Research. A Methodological Note | 2 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Sexual Reconviction for Sexual Offenders Discharged from Prison in England and Wales | 23 |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 66 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Caroline Friendship
Caroline Friendship is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (22 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (18 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Sociology and Political Science (840 citations) and Gender Studies (104 citations). Caroline Friendship has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ruth E. Mann, Anthony R. Beech, Louise Falshaw, David Thornton, Rosie Travers, Linda Blud, R. Karl Hanson, Anthony Beech, Steve Webster and S. Rutter. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.