Marcel den Dulk

6.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
73 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Marcel den Dulk is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Marcel den Dulk has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Oncology, 50 papers in Surgery and 21 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Marcel den Dulk's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (22 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (21 papers) and Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (16 papers). Marcel den Dulk is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (22 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (21 papers) and Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (16 papers). Marcel den Dulk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Marcel den Dulk's co-authors include Cornelis J.�H. van de Velde, Corrie A.M. Marijnen, H.J.T. Rutten, Hein Putter, Torbjörn Holm, Richard J. Heald, Laurence Collette, Emmanuel Tiret, Jürgen Weitz and Nuh N. Rahbari and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and Oncogene.

In The Last Decade

Marcel den Dulk

68 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: A proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer

2009 1.1k citations Marcel den Dulk, Cornelis J.�H. van de Velde et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Marcel den Dulk Netherlands	23	3.0k	2.6k	676	570	99	73	3.5k
Eduardo García‐Granero Spain	28	1.8k 0.6×	2.2k 0.8×	539 0.8×	484 0.8×	99 1.0×	143	2.9k
Giuseppe Nigri Italy	32	1.7k 0.6×	2.0k 0.7×	1.0k 1.5×	224 0.4×	176 1.8×	147	3.2k
Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey United States	25	2.4k 0.8×	1.8k 0.7×	1.1k 1.7×	266 0.5×	172 1.7×	83	3.8k
Éric Rullier France	38	5.0k 1.7×	4.8k 1.8×	837 1.2×	392 0.7×	73 0.7×	149	5.8k
Dae Wook Hwang South Korea	31	2.7k 0.9×	2.4k 0.9×	1.6k 2.4×	171 0.3×	143 1.4×	217	3.9k
Mustapha Adham France	28	1.3k 0.4×	1.5k 0.6×	814 1.2×	218 0.4×	149 1.5×	84	2.4k
Helen Marshall United Kingdom	20	2.5k 0.8×	1.7k 0.6×	646 1.0×	229 0.4×	48 0.5×	39	2.9k
Patricia Sylla United States	27	2.1k 0.7×	2.2k 0.8×	533 0.8×	188 0.3×	51 0.5×	139	3.0k
Erwin van der Harst Netherlands	31	1.8k 0.6×	3.1k 1.2×	1.2k 1.8×	263 0.5×	112 1.1×	112	4.0k
Colin Sietses Netherlands	34	2.3k 0.8×	2.7k 1.0×	640 0.9×	338 0.6×	66 0.7×	74	3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Marcel den Dulk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marcel den Dulk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcel den Dulk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcel den Dulk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marcel den Dulk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcel den Dulk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcel den Dulk. The network helps show where Marcel den Dulk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marcel den Dulk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marcel den Dulk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marcel den Dulk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marcel den Dulk. Marcel den Dulk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hoeijmakers, Lianne, et al.. (2025). The usefulness of the modified steep ramp test as a practical exercise test for preoperative risk assessment in patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 106. 111916–111916.

Bongers, Bart C., et al.. (2025). Adherence and response to supervised home-based exercise prehabilitation of unfit patients scheduled for pancreatic surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 51(10). 110302–110302. 2 indexed citations

Hendriks, T., Michel W.J.M. Wouters, M. Nielen, et al.. (2024). Assessing quality of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: nationwide benchmarking. British journal of surgery. 111(5). 4 indexed citations

Stoop, Thomas F., Roeland F. de Wilde, Marcel den Dulk, et al.. (2023). Nationwide Outcome after Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients at Very High-risk (ISGPS-D) for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula. HPB. 25. S238–S238. 1 indexed citations

Leij, Christiaan van der, Daniel Heise, Marcel den Dulk, et al.. (2023). Influence of cholestasis on portal vein embolization-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 408(1). 54–54. 1 indexed citations

Bongers, Bart C., et al.. (2023). Supervised Home-Based Exercise Prehabilitation in Unfit Patients Scheduled for Pancreatic Surgery: Protocol for a Multicenter Feasibility Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 12. e46526–e46526. 2 indexed citations

Moonen, Laura, Sanne Engelen, Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh, et al.. (2023). Predictive Genetic Biomarkers for the Development of Peritoneal Metastases in Colorectal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24(16). 12830–12830. 4 indexed citations

Westra, Daan, Felice N. van Erning, Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh, et al.. (2023). The impact of a multi-hospital network on the inequality in odds of receiving resection or ablation for synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Acta Oncologica. 62(8). 842–852. 2 indexed citations

Graaff, M De, Joost M. Klaase, Marcel den Dulk, et al.. (2023). Survival after Combined Liver Resection and Thermal Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Nationwide Population-based Propensity Score-matched Study. HPB. 25. S242–S243.

10.

Woerden, Victor van, Toine M. Lodewick, Mariëlle M.E. Coolsen, et al.. (2022). The orange-III study: the use of preoperative laxatives prior to liver surgery in an enhanced recovery programme, a randomized controlled trial. HPB. 24(9). 1492–1500. 2 indexed citations

11.

Nooijen, Lynn E., Carlijn I. Buis, Cornelis H.C. Dejong, et al.. (2022). Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB. 25(2). 210–217. 2 indexed citations

12.

Bednarsch, Jan, Zoltán Czigány, Lara R. Heij, et al.. (2021). The prognostic role of in-hospital transfusion of fresh frozen plasma in patients with cholangiocarcinoma undergoing curative-intent liver surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 48(3). 604–614. 5 indexed citations

13.

Wiltberger, Georg, Marcel den Dulk, Jan Bednarsch, et al.. (2021). Perioperative and long-term outcome of en-bloc arterial resection in pancreatic surgery. HPB. 24(7). 1119–1128. 4 indexed citations

14.

Groen, Jesse V., F. Jasmijn Smits, Marc G. Besselink, et al.. (2021). Completion pancreatectomy or a pancreas-preserving procedure during relaparotomy for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a multicentre cohort study and meta-analysis. British journal of surgery. 108(11). 1371–1379. 17 indexed citations

15.

Hundscheid, Inca H., Dirk H. S. M. Schellekens, Joep Grootjans, et al.. (2021). Evaluating the safety of two human experimental intestinal ischemia reperfusion models: A retrospective observational study. PLoS ONE. 16(6). e0253506–e0253506. 1 indexed citations

16.

Tan, Xiuxiang, Shivan Sivakumar, Jan Bednarsch, et al.. (2020). Nerve fibers in the tumor microenvironment in neurotropic cancer—pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. Oncogene. 40(5). 899–908. 76 indexed citations

17.

Bongers, Bart C., Cornelis H.C. Dejong, & Marcel den Dulk. (2020). Enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in older patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: what benefits might prehabilitation have?. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 47(3). 551–559. 41 indexed citations

18.

Kirkegård, Jakob, Eirik Kjus Aahlin, Svein Olav Bratlie, et al.. (2019). Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation. British journal of surgery. 106(6). 756–764. 45 indexed citations

19.

Balincourt, Christine de, Denis Lacombe, Corneel Coens, et al.. (2017). Multidisciplinary quality assurance and control in oncological trials: Perspectives from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). European Journal of Cancer. 86. 91–100. 13 indexed citations

20.

Dulk, Marcel den, Corrie A.M. Marijnen, Hein Putter, et al.. (2007). Risk Factors for Adverse Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated With an Abdominoperineal Resection in the Total Mesorectal Excision Trial. Annals of Surgery. 246(1). 83–90. 105 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact