Thomas Lewis

1.2k total citations
18 papers, 626 citations indexed

About

Thomas Lewis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Lewis has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 626 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Lewis's work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers). Thomas Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (6 papers). Thomas Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Tanzania. Thomas Lewis's co-authors include Lauren Mizock, A. Macfadyen, L. R. Taylor, Andrew Molodynski, Sarah Farrell, Murtaza Kadhum, Antonio Ventriglio, Dinesh Bhugra, Umberto Volpe and João Maurício Castaldelli-Maia and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Animal Ecology and JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Lewis

17 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Thomas Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • General Health Professions 270
  • Clinical Psychology 232
  • Social Psychology 181
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 145
  • Sociology and Political Science 58
Replace Margaret A. Schneider with:
Margaret A. Schneider Canada
Kelly A. Williams United States
Trevor A. Pickering United States
Jessica L. Martin United States
Lauren Gaydosh United States
Heather Larkin United States
Susan Harrington Australia
Drude Molbo Denmark
Katarzyna Adamczyk Poland
Eric C. Shattuck United States
Margaret A. Schneider Canada View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Thomas Lewis
Thomas Lewis · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Thomas Lewis
Thomas Lewis · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lewis. The network helps show where Thomas Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Lewis. Thomas Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 11
4 5
5 10
6 84
7 0
8 43
9 54
10 51
11 24
12 25
13 47
14 8
15 1
16 118
17 3
18 138

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026