Gaia Sampogna
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Andrea FiorilloMario LucianoValeria Del VecchioMaurizio PompiliUmberto VolpeVincenzo GiallonardoGabriele SaniUmberto Albert
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (46 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (34 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (32 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsThe British Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gaia Sampogna
147 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Clinical Psychology 1.7k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 868
- Social Psychology 647
- General Health Professions 556
- Sociology and Political Science 290
Countries citing papers authored by Gaia Sampogna
This map shows the geographic impact of Gaia Sampogna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gaia Sampogna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gaia Sampogna more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gaia Sampogna
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gaia Sampogna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gaia Sampogna. The network helps show where Gaia Sampogna may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gaia Sampogna
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gaia Sampogna. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gaia Sampogna based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gaia Sampogna. Gaia Sampogna is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | Training in psychopathology in Europe: are we doing well? A survey among early career psychiatrists | 1 |
| 20 | Efficacy of supportive family interventions in bipolar disorder: a review of the literature | 9 |
About Gaia Sampogna
Gaia Sampogna is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 158 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (46 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (34 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.7k citations), Biological Psychiatry (193 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (868 citations). Gaia Sampogna has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Fiorillo, Mario Luciano, Valeria Del Vecchio, Maurizio Pompili, Umberto Volpe, Vincenzo Giallonardo, Gabriele Sani, Umberto Albert, Claudia Carmassi and Giuseppe Carrà. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.