Thomas L. Jackson
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Joanne L. DavisWalter F. McKeeverRussell A. BarkleyPatricia A. ResickHarley BakerDaniel D. FedermanB. Price KerfootRobert D. Oates
- Topics
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIreland
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Jackson
27 papers receiving 477 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Gender Studies 118
- Clinical Psychology 104
- Health 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 75
- Sociology and Political Science 63
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Jackson. The network helps show where Thomas L. Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Jackson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Jackson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Jackson. Thomas L. Jackson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 5S for Healthcare | 10 |
| 5 | 76 | |
| 6 | Hoshin Kanri for the Lean Enterprise: Developing Competitive Capabilities and Managing Profit | 36 |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | Corporate diagnosis : setting the global standard for excellence | 1 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Oxbow Archaeological Incident Investigations at Twenty-Three Location Between Owens Valley, Eastern California and Walker Basin, Southwestern Nevada | 3 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Thomas L. Jackson
Thomas L. Jackson is a scholar working on General Psychology, Gender Studies and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (118 citations), Health (94 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (42 citations). Thomas L. Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Joanne L. Davis, Walter F. McKeever, Russell A. Barkley, Patricia A. Resick, Harley Baker, Daniel D. Federman, B. Price Kerfoot, Robert D. Oates, William C. DeWolf and William C. Hulbert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Academic Medicine and Brain and Language.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.