Daniel D. Federman

3.0k total citations
82 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Daniel D. Federman is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel D. Federman has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 13 papers in General Health Professions and 11 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Daniel D. Federman's work include Diversity and Career in Medicine (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers). Daniel D. Federman is often cited by papers focused on Diversity and Career in Medicine (10 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers). Daniel D. Federman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Daniel D. Federman's co-authors include William C. DeWolf, B. Price Kerfoot, Frank Davidoff, Barbara A Masser, Paul Church, Ruth Faden, J. E. RALL, Jacob Robbins, Anna C. Mastroianni and Lisa Soleymani Lehmann and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Annals of Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Daniel D. Federman

77 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel D. Federman United States 20 899 443 273 236 223 82 1.9k
Donna Brogan United States 29 595 0.7× 285 0.6× 166 0.6× 239 1.0× 193 0.9× 69 2.5k
Diana Wood United Kingdom 22 729 0.8× 385 0.9× 118 0.4× 120 0.5× 114 0.5× 70 1.9k
Norman Fost United States 27 716 0.8× 538 1.2× 138 0.5× 745 3.2× 487 2.2× 106 2.5k
Richard Farmer United Kingdom 33 583 0.6× 173 0.4× 119 0.4× 331 1.4× 264 1.2× 91 3.3k
Mary E. Ropka United States 23 451 0.5× 568 1.3× 139 0.5× 657 2.8× 686 3.1× 62 2.6k
Amy E. Wallace United States 27 411 0.5× 693 1.6× 134 0.5× 135 0.6× 55 0.2× 71 2.7k
Suzi Alves Camey Brazil 30 654 0.7× 384 0.9× 347 1.3× 137 0.6× 248 1.1× 115 2.6k
Rachael Williams United Kingdom 24 468 0.5× 236 0.5× 205 0.8× 278 1.2× 82 0.4× 80 2.1k
Grethe Albrektsen Norway 31 228 0.3× 156 0.4× 150 0.5× 206 0.9× 237 1.1× 69 2.8k
Ada M. Lindsey United States 23 480 0.5× 589 1.3× 77 0.3× 448 1.9× 72 0.3× 52 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel D. Federman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel D. Federman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel D. Federman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel D. Federman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel D. Federman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel D. Federman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel D. Federman. The network helps show where Daniel D. Federman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel D. Federman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel D. Federman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel D. Federman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel D. Federman. Daniel D. Federman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Federman, Daniel D.. (2006). The Biology of Human Sex Differences. New England Journal of Medicine. 354(14). 1507–1514. 102 indexed citations
2.
Kerfoot, B. Price, Harley Baker, Thomas L. Jackson, et al.. (2006). A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Web-Based Teaching to Medical Students. Academic Medicine. 81(3). 224–230. 76 indexed citations
3.
Kerfoot, B. Price, William C. DeWolf, Barbara A Masser, Paul Church, & Daniel D. Federman. (2006). Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial. Medical Education. 41(1). 23–31. 205 indexed citations
4.
Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani, et al.. (2004). A Survey of Medical Ethics Education at U.S. and Canadian Medical Schools. Academic Medicine. 79(7). 682–689. 128 indexed citations
5.
Federman, Daniel D., Kathi E. Hanna, & Laura Lyman Rodriguez. (2002). Protecting Participants in Social, Behavioral, and Economic Science Research: Issues, Current Problems, and Potential Solutions, Report from the Panel on IRBs, Surveys, and Social Science Research. Behavioural Brain Research. 26(2-3). 171–84. 1 indexed citations
6.
Gold, Wayne L., Patricia J. McArdle, & Daniel D. Federman. (2002). Should Medical School Faculty See Assessments of Students Made by Previous Teachers?. Academic Medicine. 77(11). 1096–1100. 11 indexed citations
7.
Danis, Marion, Daniel D. Federman, Joseph J. Fins, et al.. (1999). Incorporating palliative care into critical care education: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. Critical Care Medicine. 27(9). 2005–2013. 136 indexed citations
8.
Federman, Daniel D.. (1999). Little-heralded advantages of problem-based learning. Academic Medicine. 74(2). 93–4. 7 indexed citations
9.
Mastroianni, Anna C., Ruth Faden, & Daniel D. Federman. (1999). Health Status of American Indian and Alaska Native Women. 3 indexed citations
10.
Mastroianni, Anna C., Ruth Faden, & Daniel D. Federman. (1999). Ethical Issues Related to the Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials (I). 6 indexed citations
11.
Mastroianni, Anna C., Ruth Faden, & Daniel D. Federman. (1994). Workshop and commissioned papers. 2 indexed citations
12.
Mastroianni, Anna C., Ruth Faden, Daniel D. Federman, Michael A. Grodin, & Leonard H. Glantz. (1994). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies (2 vols): Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics and Law. BMJ. 309(6961). 1095.1–1095.1. 16 indexed citations
13.
Federman, Daniel D.. (1991). Hyperthyroidism in the Geriatric Population. Hospital Practice. 26(2). 61–76. 8 indexed citations
14.
Federman, Daniel D., S. James Adelstein, Christine K. Cassel, et al.. (1989). The Physician's Responsibility toward Hopelessly Ill Patients. New England Journal of Medicine. 320(13). 844–849. 324 indexed citations
15.
Wyshak, Grace, et al.. (1986). Pregnancy during Residency. New England Journal of Medicine. 314(7). 418–423. 78 indexed citations
16.
Federman, Daniel D.. (1982). Impotence: Etiology and Management. Hospital Practice. 17(3). 155–159. 13 indexed citations
17.
Cabot, Richard C., Robert E. Scully, Betty U. McNeely, Daniel D. Federman, & Benjamin Castleman. (1974). Case 30-1974. New England Journal of Medicine. 291(5). 242–249. 4 indexed citations
18.
Federman, Daniel D.. (1974). His and Hers. New England Journal of Medicine. 290(20). 1137–1138. 30 indexed citations
19.
Federman, Daniel D., et al.. (1968). Abnormal Sexual Development. A Genetic and Endocrine Approach to the Differential Diagnosis.. Annals of Internal Medicine. 68(2). 501–501. 47 indexed citations
20.
Federman, Daniel D., Jacob Robbins, & J. E. RALL. (1958). Some Observations on Cretinism and Its Treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. 259(13). 610–615. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026