Thomas Kling

449 citations
20 papers · 306 indexed · h-index 8

Thomas Kling

16 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Thomas Kling
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 265
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 133
  • Instrumentation 9
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 50
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 17
Replace W. M. Schlingman with:
W. M. Schlingman United States
Robert A. Laing United States
Cecilia Kozma Sweden
E. Parizot France
K. Hurley United States
Jasmina Lazendic-Galloway Australia
Paula Tuzón Spain
Stephen L. Redman United States
Ronald Gautreau United States
Артур Д. Чернин Russia
Thomas Kling relative to W. M. Schlingman United States W. M. Schlingman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
W. M. Schlingman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kling. The network helps show where Thomas Kling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kling Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20233
4 20191
5 201716
6 20172
7 20169
8 20152
9
Five is 75: Student Success Perspectives, Status, & Highlights
20140
10 20110
11 20082
12 200512
13 200210
14 20006
15 200011
16 2000201
17 20005
18 200012
19 199913
20 19941

About Thomas Kling

Thomas Kling is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Oceanography, Safety Research and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (3 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (265 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (133 citations), Instrumentation (9 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (50 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (17 citations). Thomas Kling has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Ezra T. Newman, Simonetta Frittelli, Alejandro Pérez, David Wittman, Ian Dell’Antonio, J. A. Tyson, Bryan Campbell, Laura R. Ramsey, Catherine Womack and David S. Simon. Their work appears in journals such as General Relativity and Gravitation, Research in Higher Education, Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice, International Journal of STEM Education and The Astrophysical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026