Thomas Kelly

55 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

Thomas Kelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Library and Information Sciences 54
  • Anthropology 160
  • Archeology 151
  • Archeology 10
  • Classics 23
Replace Ian Johnson with:
Ian Johnson United Kingdom
Lynne C. Lancaster United States
Lynette Russell Australia
Suraiya Faroqhi Türkiye
David Buisseret United States
Herbert Franke Germany
Kevin Greene United States
Richard N. Frye United States
Oleg Grabar United States
Svetlana Alpers United States
Thomas Kelly relative to Ian Johnson United Kingdom Ian Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Ian Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kelly. The network helps show where Thomas Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kelly Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kelly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20230
3 202012
4 20190
5
Faculty Conceptions and Misconceptions in Hybrid Education
20071
6
What really matters for faculty to develop and implement hybrid/blended courses?
20072
7 20038
8 20006
9 19984
10 199620
11 19891
12 19792
13 197620
14 19722
15 19703
16 197014
17 19691
18
Public libraries in Great Britain before 1850
19661
19 19642
20 195817

About Thomas Kelly

Thomas Kelly is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Anthropology, Archeology, Architecture and Education, having authored 66 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (17 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (8 papers), Library Science and Administration (6 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (5 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (5 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (4 papers) and Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (54 citations), Anthropology (160 citations), Archeology (151 citations), Archeology (10 citations) and Classics (23 citations). Thomas Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Snodgrass, Gary Reger, W. H. G. Armytage, Arnold J. Toynbee, Paul van Kampen, Mieke De Cock, Jenaro Guisasola, Kristina Zuza, D. L. Richardson and Alden A. Mosshammer. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, British Journal of Educational Studies, Physical Review Physics Education Research, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy and Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026