David H. Clements

4.4k total citations
51 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

David H. Clements is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, David H. Clements has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Surgery, 24 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in David H. Clements's work include Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (43 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (42 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (22 papers). David H. Clements is often cited by papers focused on Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (43 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (42 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (22 papers). David H. Clements collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. David H. Clements's co-authors include Randal R. Betz, Peter O. Newton, Thomas G. Lowe, Lawrence G. Lenke, Linda P. DʼAndrea, J. Harms, Tracey P. Bastrom, Michelle C. Marks, Andrew Merola and Thomas R. Häher and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spine and Anesthesiology.

In The Last Decade

David H. Clements

50 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David H. Clements United States 30 3.1k 1.3k 100 99 88 51 3.2k
Michelle C. Marks United States 28 2.5k 0.8× 1.0k 0.8× 98 1.0× 112 1.1× 21 0.2× 81 2.6k
Harry L. Shufflebarger United States 28 2.7k 0.9× 1.3k 1.0× 109 1.1× 27 0.3× 32 0.4× 63 2.8k
Joshua M. Pahys United States 28 2.4k 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 102 1.0× 87 0.9× 13 0.1× 131 2.6k
Connie Poe-Kochert United States 24 1.9k 0.6× 470 0.4× 63 0.6× 49 0.5× 210 2.4× 50 2.1k
Khaled M. Kebaish United States 23 2.5k 0.8× 1.8k 1.4× 106 1.1× 17 0.2× 16 0.2× 125 2.8k
Joseph H. Perra United States 28 3.4k 1.1× 2.2k 1.6× 206 2.1× 48 0.5× 7 0.1× 58 3.6k
Kai-Ming Fu United States 20 1.9k 0.6× 1.3k 1.0× 111 1.1× 44 0.4× 7 0.1× 24 2.2k
Jahangir Asghar United States 19 1.1k 0.4× 498 0.4× 40 0.4× 52 0.5× 24 0.3× 52 1.3k
Lindsay M. Andras United States 19 1.2k 0.4× 295 0.2× 42 0.4× 25 0.3× 22 0.3× 141 1.4k
Mun Keong Kwan Malaysia 20 1.2k 0.4× 490 0.4× 54 0.5× 15 0.2× 58 0.7× 142 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by David H. Clements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Clements's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Clements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Clements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Clements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Clements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Clements. The network helps show where David H. Clements may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David H. Clements

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David H. Clements. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David H. Clements based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David H. Clements. David H. Clements is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Newton, Peter O., Michelle C. Marks, Tracey P. Bastrom, et al.. (2012). Surgical Treatment of Lenke 1 Main Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 38(4). 328–338. 61 indexed citations
4.
Clements, David H., Michelle Marks, Peter O. Newton, et al.. (2011). Did the Lenke Classification Change Scoliosis Treatment?. Spine. 36(14). 1142–1145. 22 indexed citations
5.
Samdani, Amer F., et al.. (2010). A patient with myelomeningocele: is untethering necessary prior to scoliosis correction?. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 29(1). E8–E8. 13 indexed citations
6.
Cahill, Patrick J., Sean C. Marvil, David H. Clements, et al.. (2010). Autofusion in the Immature Spine Treated With Growing Rods. Spine. 35(22). E1199–E1203. 133 indexed citations
7.
Helgeson, Melvin D., Suken A. Shah, Peter O. Newton, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Following Pedicle Screw, Hook, or Hybrid Instrumentation. Spine. 35(2). 177–181. 221 indexed citations
8.
Tis, John E., Michael O’Brien, Peter O. Newton, et al.. (2009). Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated With Open Instrumented Anterior Spinal Fusion. Spine. 35(1). 64–70. 32 indexed citations
9.
Clements, David H., Randal R. Betz, Peter O. Newton, et al.. (2009). Correlation of Scoliosis Curve Correction With the Number and Type of Fixation Anchors. Spine. 34(20). 2147–2150. 114 indexed citations
10.
Samdani, Amer F., Ashish Ranade, Daniel M. Sciubba, et al.. (2009). Accuracy of free-hand placement of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much of a difference does surgeon experience make?. European Spine Journal. 19(1). 91–95. 107 indexed citations
11.
Tsutsui, Shunji, Jeff Pawelek, Tracey P. Bastrom, et al.. (2009). Dissecting the Effects of Spinal Fusion and Deformity Magnitude on Quality of Life in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 34(18). E653–E658. 25 indexed citations
12.
McCarthy, James J., Linda P. DʼAndrea, Randal R. Betz, & David H. Clements. (2006). Scoliosis in the Child With Cerebral Palsy. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 14(6). 367–375. 66 indexed citations
13.
Lowe, Thomas G., Lawrence G. Lenke, Randal R. Betz, et al.. (2006). Distal Junctional Kyphosis of Adolescent Idiopathic Thoracic Curves Following Anterior or Posterior Instrumented Fusion: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Spine. 31(3). 299–302. 81 indexed citations
14.
Grewal, Harsh, Randal R. Betz, Linda P. DʼAndrea, David H. Clements, & Scott Porter. (2005). A prospective comparison of thoracoscopic vs open anterior instrumentation and spinal fusion for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 40(1). 153–157. 28 indexed citations
15.
Newton, Peter O., Michelle C. Marks, Frances D. Faro, et al.. (2003). Use of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery to Reduce Perioperative Morbidity in Scoliosis Surgery. Spine. 28(Supplement). S249–S254. 94 indexed citations
16.
Lenke, Lawrence G., Randal R. Betz, David H. Clements, et al.. (2002). Curve Prevalence of a New Classification of Operative Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 27(6). 604–611. 139 indexed citations
17.
Betz, Randal R., J. Harms, David H. Clements, et al.. (1999). Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Instrumentation for Correction of Adolescent Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 24(3). 225–239. 268 indexed citations
18.
Murrell, William, et al.. (1998). Comparison of Thoracoscopic and Open Thoracic Discectomy in a Live Ovine Model for Anterior Spinal Fusion. Spine. 23(15). 1699–1702. 28 indexed citations
19.
Carlsson, Christer, et al.. (1995). Percutaneous Aspiration of Lumbar Facet Synovial Cyst. Anesthesiology. 82(4). 1061–1062.. 28 indexed citations
20.
Clements, David H., et al.. (1990). Osteitis pubis: a clinical challenge *.. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 34(4). 206–211. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026