Thomas J. Brandeis

1.3k citations
44 papers · 777 indexed · h-index 16

Thomas J. Brandeis

44 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Thomas J. Brandeis
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Global and Planetary Change 479
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 432
  • Ecology 209
  • Environmental Engineering 148
  • Insect Science 90
Replace Alessio Collalti with:
Alessio Collalti Italy
Mateus Dantas de Paula Germany
Erik Andersson Sweden
Edna Rödig Germany
Leen Depauw Belgium
Jorge Omar López–Martínez Mexico
Vanessa Boukili United States
Thomas Cordonnier France
Matheus Henrique Nunes United Kingdom
Rita Sousa‐Silva Canada
Thomas J. Brandeis relative to Alessio Collalti Italy Alessio Collalti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Alessio Collalti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Brandeis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Brandeis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Brandeis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Brandeis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Brandeis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Brandeis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Brandeis. The network helps show where Thomas J. Brandeis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Brandeis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Brandeis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Brandeis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Brandeis. Thomas J. Brandeis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 2
4 1
5 1
6 7
7 5
8 9
9 7
10
Changes in land use, forest ownership, parcel size, and fragmentation in forests of the U.S
2
11 3
12 23
13 28
14
East Texas, 2012—Forest Inventory and Analysis Factsheet
1
15 13
16 42
17 33
18
Allometric equations for predicting Puerto Rican dry forest biomass and volume
4
19 7
20
Effects of Model Choice and Forest Structure on Inventory-Based Estimations of Puerto Rican Forest Biomass
7

About Thomas J. Brandeis

Thomas J. Brandeis is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecological Modeling, having authored 44 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (22 papers), Forest Management and Policy (16 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (432 citations), Global and Planetary Change (479 citations) and Ecological Modeling (71 citations). Thomas J. Brandeis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eileen H. Helmer, Elizabeth Cole, Michael Newton, Ariel E. Lugo, Francisco J. Escobedo, Bernard R. Parresol, John D. Shaw, William H. McWilliams, Patrick D. Miles and Andrew Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Remote Sensing of Environment and Journal of Environmental Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026