John M. Lhotka

839 total citations
56 papers, 626 citations indexed

About

John M. Lhotka is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Lhotka has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 626 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 31 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 12 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in John M. Lhotka's work include Forest ecology and management (28 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (18 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers). John M. Lhotka is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (28 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (18 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers). John M. Lhotka collaborates with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Canada. John M. Lhotka's co-authors include Edward F. Loewenstein, Jeffrey W. Stringer, G. Andrew Stainback, Puneet Dwivedi, Christopher D. Barton, James J. Zaczek, David L. Parrott, Carmen T. Agouridis, Richard C. Warner and Dylan N. Dillaway and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Sustainability and Biomass and Bioenergy.

In The Last Decade

John M. Lhotka

52 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John M. Lhotka United States 14 372 335 115 81 73 56 626
W. Kollert France 4 289 0.8× 380 1.1× 149 1.3× 77 1.0× 66 0.9× 8 694
Carola Paul Germany 20 343 0.9× 626 1.9× 117 1.0× 65 0.8× 41 0.6× 50 912
Róbert Marušák Czechia 14 292 0.8× 357 1.1× 84 0.7× 90 1.1× 91 1.2× 69 601
Michael den Herder Finland 16 236 0.6× 369 1.1× 226 2.0× 171 2.1× 58 0.8× 29 1.0k
Sergey Zudin Finland 13 274 0.7× 506 1.5× 172 1.5× 49 0.6× 173 2.4× 20 873
Christian Cossalter Indonesia 12 245 0.7× 299 0.9× 67 0.6× 81 1.0× 29 0.4× 36 675
Mauro Maesano Italy 16 177 0.5× 367 1.1× 178 1.5× 115 1.4× 148 2.0× 45 701
Joanne Fitzgerald Ireland 9 289 0.8× 398 1.2× 147 1.3× 75 0.9× 74 1.0× 12 711
Susana Barreiro Portugal 14 290 0.8× 416 1.2× 79 0.7× 37 0.5× 105 1.4× 26 604
Warren D. Devine United States 17 387 1.0× 374 1.1× 171 1.5× 88 1.1× 52 0.7× 48 807

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Lhotka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Lhotka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Lhotka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Lhotka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Lhotka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Lhotka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Lhotka. The network helps show where John M. Lhotka may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Lhotka

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Lhotka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Lhotka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Lhotka. John M. Lhotka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ochuodho, Thomas O., et al.. (2025). Economic impacts of maple syrup production potential in Kentucky: Input-output analysis. Forest Policy and Economics. 173. 103459–103459. 1 indexed citations
2.
Ochuodho, Thomas O., et al.. (2024). Assessing the factors affecting maple syrup yield in the US and predicting production potential in Kentucky. Trees Forests and People. 17. 100649–100649. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lhotka, John M., et al.. (2020). Comparison of unmanaged and managed Trojan Fir-Scots pine forests for structural complexity. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 1 indexed citations
4.
Lhotka, John M., et al.. (2019). Comparison of unmanaged and managed Trojan Fir–Scots pine forests for structural complexity. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY. 44(1). 62–70. 7 indexed citations
5.
Yang, Jian, et al.. (2018). Dynamics of Postfire Aboveground Carbon in a Chronosequence of Chinese Boreal Larch Forests. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences. 123(12). 3490–3506. 9 indexed citations
6.
Agha, Mickey, Brian D. Todd, Ben C. Augustine, et al.. (2018). Effects of gap-based silviculture on thermal biology of a terrestrial reptile. Wildlife Research. 45(1). 72–81. 9 indexed citations
7.
Lhotka, John M.. (2016). Examining growth relationships in Quercus stands: An application of individual-tree models developed from long-term thinning experiments. Forest Ecology and Management. 385. 65–77. 16 indexed citations
8.
Lhotka, John M., David L. Parrott, & Charles M. Ruffner. (2016). A Dendroecological Investigation of an Upland Oak-Dominated Forest within the Grand Prairie Region of Illinois. Natural Areas Journal. 36(3). 310–322. 2 indexed citations
9.
Stainback, G. Andrew, et al.. (2015). Economic and Life-Cycle Analysis of Forest Carbon Sequestration and Wood-Based Bioenergy Offsets in the Central Hardwood Forest Region of United States. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 34(3). 214–232. 12 indexed citations
10.
Lhotka, John M. & Edward F. Loewenstein. (2015). Comparing individual-tree approaches for predicting height growth of underplanted seedlings. Annals of Forest Science. 72(4). 469–477. 4 indexed citations
12.
Lhotka, John M., et al.. (2014). Evaluating Initial Responses of Natural and Underplanted Oak Reproduction and a Shade-Tolerant Competitor to Midstory Removal. Forest Science. 60(6). 1164–1171. 18 indexed citations
13.
Lhotka, John M., et al.. (2013). Response of naturally regenerated and underplanted white oak (Quercus alba L.) seedlings 6 years following midstory removal. 117. 365–372. 1 indexed citations
14.
Parrott, David L., John M. Lhotka, & Jeffrey W. Stringer. (2013). The Effect of Soil Scarification on <I>Quercus</I> Seedling Establishment Within Upland Stands of the Northern Cumberland Plateau. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 30(3). 125–130. 1 indexed citations
15.
Stainback, G. Andrew, et al.. (2013). Bioenergy development in Kentucky: A SWOT-ANP analysis. Forest Policy and Economics. 28. 38–43. 87 indexed citations
16.
Lhotka, John M. & Jeffrey W. Stringer. (2013). Forest edge effects on Quercus reproduction within naturally regenerated mixed broadleaf stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 43(10). 911–918. 16 indexed citations
17.
Parrott, David L., et al.. (2012). Improving Woody Biomass Estimation Efficiency Using Double Sampling. Forests. 3(2). 179–189. 2 indexed citations
18.
Lhotka, John M. & Edward F. Loewenstein. (2009). Effect of Midstory Removal on Understory Light Availability and the 2–Year Response of Underplanted Cherrybark Oak Seedlings. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 33(4). 171–177. 32 indexed citations
19.
Lhotka, John M., James J. Zaczek, & Russell T. Graham. (2004). The Influence of Soil Scarification on Oak Reproduction: Review and Management Considerations. 4 indexed citations
20.
Lhotka, John M. & James J. Zaczek. (2003). Soil Scarification Effects on Oak Reproduction in Two Mixed-Oak Bottomland Stands of Southern Illinois. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 27(3). 164–171. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026