Thomas J. Booth
Impact in
- Archeology top 0.5%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Paleopathology and ancient diseases
- Paleontology top 5%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Papers in
- Archeology 13
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 13
- Paleopathology and ancient diseases 10
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 8
- Co-authors
- Richard MadgwickRebecca RedfernRebecca GowlandMike Parker PearsonAndrew ChamberlainJoanna BrückIan BarnesPhilippe Rentzel
- Journals
- World Archaeology (3 papers)Journal of Archaeological Science (3 papers)Archaeometry (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Investigation (1 paper)Cambridge Archaeological Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandSweden
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. Booth
18 papers receiving 470 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Archeology 365
- Paleontology 173
- Anthropology 106
- Insect Science 130
- Space and Planetary Science 12
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Booth. The network helps show where Thomas J. Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 9 | East Chisenbury Midden 2015−17: further investigations of the late prehistoric middendeposits, enclosure and associated settlement | 2021 | 2 |
| 10 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 43 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 69 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 79 |
About Thomas J. Booth
Thomas J. Booth is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Insect Science and Anthropology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (13 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (10 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (8 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (6 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Indigenous Studies and Ecology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (365 citations), Paleontology (173 citations), Anthropology (106 citations), Insect Science (130 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (12 citations). Thomas J. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Richard Madgwick, Rebecca Redfern, Rebecca Gowland, Mike Parker Pearson, Andrew Chamberlain, Joanna Brück, Ian Barnes, Philippe Rentzel, Werner Vach and Jörg Schibler. Their work appears in journals such as World Archaeology, Journal of Archaeological Science, Archaeometry, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Cambridge Archaeological Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.