Cambridge Archaeological Journal

915 papers and 14.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 915 papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal usually cover Anthropology (396 papers), Paleontology (392 papers) and Archeology (277 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (388 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (188 papers) and Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (175 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cambridge Archaeological Journal are Steven Mithen, Stephen Shennan, Ofer Bar‐Yosef, Lyn Wadley, Thomas Wynn, David A. Freidel, Jonathan Μ. Hall, Chris Scarre, Clive Gamble and Colin Renfrew.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Cambridge Archaeological Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cambridge Archaeological Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025