Countries where authors publish in Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cambridge Archaeological Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal.
About Cambridge Archaeological Journal
The 941 papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal in the last decades have received a total of 16.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Cambridge Archaeological Journal usually cover Archeology (182 papers), Paleontology (408 papers) and Anthropology (408 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (404 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (193 papers) and Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cambridge Archaeological Journal are Steven Mithen, Stephen Shennan, Lyn Wadley, Thomas Wynn, Jonathan Μ. Hall, David A. Freidel, Chris Scarre, Colin Renfrew, Yannis Hamilakis and Clive Gamble.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.