Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities
2005656 citationsRory P. O’Shea, Thomas J. Allen et al.Research Policyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Allen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Allen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Allen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Allen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Allen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Allen. The network helps show where Thomas J. Allen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Allen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Allen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Allen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Allen. Thomas J. Allen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Allen, Thomas J., et al.. (2011). Technology Transfer to Developing Countries: The International Technological Gatekeeper. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).4 indexed citations
2.
Allen, Thomas J. & Sean Cooney. (2011). Institutional roles in technology transfer. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
3.
Allen, Thomas J., et al.. (2011). Obsolescence or Conformity to Expectation?: A Study of Technical Obsolescence in One Large Technology-Based Organization. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
4.
Allen, Thomas J., et al.. (2009). Does Geographic Clustering Still Benefit High Tech New Ventures? The Case of the Cambridge/Boston Biotech Cluster. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).4 indexed citations
O’Shea, Rory P., Thomas J. Allen, Arnaud Chevalier, & Frank Roche. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy. 34(7). 994–1009.656 indexed citations breakdown →
Allen, Thomas J., et al.. (1987). Transferring Technology to the Small Manufacturing Firm : A Study of Technology Transfer in Three Countries : Research Policy. 2(4). 570.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.