Thomas Hove
Impact in
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Media Studies and Communication
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Social Media and Politics 11
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication 11
- Media Studies and Communication 7
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 10
- Co-authors
- Hye‐Jin PaekSang‐Hwa OhKitae KimRichard T. ColeHyun Jung OhMikyoung KimLewis A. FriedlandHyun Ju Jeong
- Journals
- Health Communication (10 papers)Communication Theory (3 papers)Journal of Health Communication (3 papers)Philosophy and Rhetoric (2 papers)Asian Journal of Communication (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Thomas Hove
54 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Communication 472
- Applied Psychology 180
- Literature and Literary Theory 227
- Sociology and Political Science 822
- Health 158
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hove
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hove more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hove
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hove. The network helps show where Thomas Hove may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hove, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 98 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 134 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 107 | |
| 19 | Peer or Expert? The Persuasive Impact of YouTube Video Producers and Their Moderating Mechanism | 2010 | 3 |
| 20 | 2006 | 83 |
About Thomas Hove
Thomas Hove is a scholar working on Communication, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (11 papers), Risk Perception and Management (11 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (9 papers), Media Influence and Health (8 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (8 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (472 citations), Applied Psychology (180 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (227 citations), Sociology and Political Science (822 citations) and Health (158 citations). Thomas Hove has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hye‐Jin Paek, Sang‐Hwa Oh, Kitae Kim, Richard T. Cole, Hyun Jung Oh, Mikyoung Kim, Lewis A. Friedland, Hyun Ju Jeong, Hernando Rojas and Hyegyu Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Health Communication, Communication Theory, Journal of Health Communication, Philosophy and Rhetoric and Asian Journal of Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.