Thomas Hinault
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Patrick LemaireSusan CourtneyAlain DagherStéphane DufauFrancis EustacheNatalie A. PhillipsKevin LarcherP. Lemaire
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers)Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (15 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Thomas Hinault
36 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cognitive Neuroscience 358
- Statistics and Probability 134
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 117
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 49
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hinault
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hinault's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hinault with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hinault more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hinault
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hinault. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hinault. The network helps show where Thomas Hinault may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Hinault
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Hinault. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Hinault based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Hinault. Thomas Hinault is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Thomas Hinault
Thomas Hinault is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability and General Decision Sciences, having authored 39 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (15 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (358 citations), Statistics and Probability (134 citations) and General Decision Sciences (26 citations). Thomas Hinault has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Lemaire, Patrick Lemaire, Susan Courtney, Alain Dagher, Stéphane Dufau, Francis Eustache, Natalie A. Phillips, Kevin Larcher, P. Lemaire and Dayna R. Touron. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.