Thomas G. Smith

37 total papers · 616 total citations
20 papers, 347 citations indexed

About

Thomas G. Smith is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas G. Smith has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 347 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Thomas G. Smith's work include GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (3 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers) and Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (2 papers). Thomas G. Smith is often cited by papers focused on GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (3 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers) and Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (2 papers). Thomas G. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Iran and United Kingdom. Thomas G. Smith's co-authors include Warren H. Jones, Stephen Briggs, Martha Morton, Davoud Fatmehsari Haghshenas, Hamzeh F. Haghshenas, Mahdieh Khedmati, Yong‐Rak Kim, Robert Powers, Fatema Bhinderwala and K. W. JONES and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Applied Physics Letters and Analytical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Thomas G. Smith

19 papers receiving 335 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas G. Smith 73 55 54 52 46 20 347
Yiyuan Li 29 0.4× 14 0.3× 41 0.8× 94 1.8× 8 0.2× 35 369
Wenjie Yang 36 0.5× 25 0.5× 16 0.3× 35 0.7× 17 0.4× 31 321
Lisa Tran 47 0.6× 22 0.4× 13 0.2× 25 0.5× 81 1.8× 16 312
Xiaoqian Wu 82 1.1× 14 0.3× 51 0.9× 35 0.7× 17 0.4× 31 307
Xiu Zhang 46 0.6× 10 0.2× 32 0.6× 34 0.7× 20 0.4× 29 371
Yanghee Lee 179 2.5× 8 0.1× 51 0.9× 4 0.1× 44 1.0× 43 396
Ke Yang 47 0.6× 30 0.5× 31 0.6× 31 0.6× 28 0.6× 22 340
Qianwen Peng 100 1.4× 22 0.4× 43 0.8× 84 1.6× 16 0.3× 28 345
Yuko Kishimoto 24 0.3× 16 0.3× 46 0.9× 140 2.7× 49 1.1× 20 346
Yiwei Feng 119 1.6× 14 0.3× 49 0.9× 43 0.8× 34 0.7× 32 386

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Smith. The network helps show where Thomas G. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas G. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas G. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas G. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas G. Smith. Thomas G. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026