Thomas G. Holzman
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert GlaserJames W. PellegrinoHarley HamiltonStephen AllenRobert J. GlaserDennis Thompson
- Topics
- Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyStatistics and ProbabilityHuman-Computer Interaction
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas G. Holzman
16 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 126
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 100
- Artificial Intelligence 79
- Cognitive Neuroscience 78
- Statistics and Probability 69
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Holzman
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Holzman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Holzman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Holzman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Holzman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Holzman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Holzman. The network helps show where Thomas G. Holzman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas G. Holzman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas G. Holzman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas G. Holzman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas G. Holzman. Thomas G. Holzman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 50 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 87 | |
| 10 | Short-Term Memory for Auditory Sequences and Reading Skill. | 1 |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Cognitive Determinants of Series Completion: Individual and Developmental Differences. | 2 |
| 15 | Developing Computer Literacy in Children: Some Observations and Suggestions. | 4 |
| 16 | 34 |
About Thomas G. Holzman
Thomas G. Holzman is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (126 citations), Statistics and Probability (69 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (43 citations). Thomas G. Holzman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Glaser, James W. Pellegrino, Harley Hamilton, Stephen Allen, Robert J. Glaser and Dennis Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Memory & Cognition and Behaviour and Information Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.