Thomas E. Williams

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Hematology 202
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 291
  • Physiology 406
  • Genetics 163
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 161
Replace Asha R. Kallianpur with:
Asha R. Kallianpur United States
Yang Gu United States
F X Gonzalez-Crussi United States
Walter Krugluger Austria
Robert I. Parker United States
Claudio Favre Italy
Takashi Ozaki Japan
Daniela Concolino Italy
Karin Potthoff Germany
Concetta Scazzone Italy
Thomas E. Williams relative to Asha R. Kallianpur United States Asha R. Kallianpur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Asha R. Kallianpur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Williams. The network helps show where Thomas E. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998277
2 1996272
3 1972163
4 1982109
5 2020103
6 198574
7 202066
8 198662
9 197156
10
Nonpenetrating trauma to the thoracic aorta.
197748
11 197739
12 202439
13 201431
14 202224
15 198423
16 197122
17 197420
18 201720
19 200818
20 197316

About Thomas E. Williams

Thomas E. Williams is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Rheumatology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (18 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (5 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (4 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers) and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (202 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (291 citations), Physiology (406 citations), Genetics (163 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (161 citations). Thomas E. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel McNeel Lane, Wataru W. Sutow, Simon Jeremy Chataway, Vita J. Land, Donald J. Fernbach, Mohamed Omer, Gaafar I. Suliman, R. G. Hendrickse, Sarah Macfarlane and John Coulter. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neurology, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Blood, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact