Fahima Dossa
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents 5
- Co-authors
- Nancy N. BaxterSergio A. AcuñaTyler R. ChesneyAndrea N. SimpsonRinku SutradharDavid R. UrbachMaria C. CusimanoSarah E. Ferguson
- Journals
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (5 papers)British journal of surgery (5 papers)JAMA Surgery (4 papers)BMJ Open (3 papers)Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Fahima Dossa
54 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Gender Studies 272
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 187
- Oncology 623
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 127
- Surgery 608
Countries citing papers authored by Fahima Dossa
This map shows the geographic impact of Fahima Dossa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fahima Dossa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fahima Dossa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fahima Dossa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fahima Dossa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fahima Dossa. The network helps show where Fahima Dossa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fahima Dossa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 60 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 10 | 大腸内視鏡検査における鎮静のための短時間作用性オピオイドの有無によるプロポフォール対ミダゾラム: 安全性,満足度および効率転帰の系統的レビューとメタ分析【JST・京大機械翻訳】 | 2020 | 2 |
| 11 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 88 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 90 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 20 | A watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer after a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 369 |
About Fahima Dossa
Fahima Dossa is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Oncology, Gender Studies and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (10 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (7 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (5 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (272 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (187 citations), Oncology (623 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (127 citations) and Surgery (608 citations). Fahima Dossa has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nancy N. Baxter, Sergio A. Acuña, Tyler R. Chesney, Andrea N. Simpson, Rinku Sutradhar, David R. Urbach, Maria C. Cusimano, Sarah E. Ferguson, Yuvreet Kaur and Steven D. Wexner. Their work appears in journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, British journal of surgery, JAMA Surgery, BMJ Open and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.