Thomas E. O’Dell
- Insect Science top 5%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 6
-
- Lichen and fungal ecology 4
- Plant and fungal interactions 2
- Plant Science top 5%
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 12
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 6
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 4
-
- Fungal Biology and Applications 2
-
- Genetic diversity and population structure 2
- Co-authors
- Joseph F. AmmiratiJames M. TrappeEdward G. SchreinerMatthias C. RilligV. Bala ChaudharyNancy Collins JohnsonGregory M. MuellerD. Jean Lodge
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySpain
In The Last Decade
Thomas E. O’Dell
16 papers receiving 606 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Insect Science 216
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 294
- Plant Science 510
- Cell Biology 212
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 103
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. O’Dell
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. O’Dell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. O’Dell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. O’Dell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. O’Dell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. O’Dell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. O’Dell. The network helps show where Thomas E. O’Dell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. O’Dell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 141 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 7 | Collecting and describing macrofungi | 2004 | 75 |
| 8 | Recommended protocols for sampling macrofungi | 2004 | 17 |
| 9 | Approaches to sampling macrofungi | 2004 | 24 |
| 10 | 2003 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 75 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 59 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 50 | |
| 14 | Diversity and conservation of forest fungi | 1996 | 12 |
| 15 | 1993 | 64 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 28 |
About Thomas E. O’Dell
Thomas E. O’Dell is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cell Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (12 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (216 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (294 citations) and Plant Science (510 citations). Thomas E. O’Dell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Joseph F. Ammirati, James M. Trappe, Edward G. Schreiner, Matthias C. Rillig, V. Bala Chaudhary, Nancy Collins Johnson, Gregory M. Mueller, D. Jean Lodge, Randy Molina and Susie Dunham. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, New Phytologist, Ecological Applications, Fungal ecology and Canadian Journal of Plant Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.