Ingeborg Haug

931 citations
25 papers · 627 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ingeborg Haug

25 papers receiving 597 citations

Peers

Ingeborg Haug
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Insect Science 210
  • Plant Science 550
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 262
  • Cell Biology 214
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 87
Replace Mónica A. Lugo with:
Mónica A. Lugo Argentina
B. Münzenberger Germany
Ülle Saks Estonia
Sandra Farto Botelho Trufem Brazil
Keerthi Mandyam United States
Keisuke Obase Japan
Thomas E. O’Dell United States
Cameron Egan United States
K. Udaiyan India
Kai Riess Germany
Ingeborg Haug relative to Mónica A. Lugo Argentina Mónica A. Lugo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mónica A. Lugo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingeborg Haug

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingeborg Haug's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingeborg Haug with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingeborg Haug more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingeborg Haug

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingeborg Haug. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingeborg Haug. The network helps show where Ingeborg Haug may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingeborg Haug, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingeborg Haug Line = papers co-authored together Ingeborg Haug links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 201913
3 20151
4 201319
5 201210
6
Species-rich but distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal communities in reforestation plots on degraded pastures and in neighboring pristine tropical mountain rain forest.
201023
7 201011
8 200916
9 200717
10 200412
11 200472
12 200436
13 200381
14 200221
15 199834
16 199413
17 199113
18 19904
19 19892
20 198814

About Ingeborg Haug

Ingeborg Haug is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Cell Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (24 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (210 citations), Plant Science (550 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (262 citations), Cell Biology (214 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (87 citations). Ingeborg Haug has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Ecuador and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Franz Oberwinkler, Ingrid Kottke, Michael Weiß, Juan Pablo Suárez, Sabrina Setaro, Martin Nebel, Jürgen Homeier, Katarzyna Hrynkiewicz, Christel Baum and Robert Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as Mycological Progress, New Phytologist, Mycologia, Mycorrhiza and Trees.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026